Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84293564

Hi. Additional to my previous message.
Be sure the object you want to map is a building. It must show a shadow (if not hidden behind trees) The shadow proofs that it is above ground level thus mostly a building. Here you mapped an empty space, somewhat coloured as a building. I removed it.
btw. The traces you mapped as an unclassified highway are in fact just paths, which in not uncommon in these regio's
Best regards

Hello Alexandra, You requested a review.
You mapped 1 building, but forget to square it.
and ... connected 2 nodes to the highway you mapped. Never do that. Navigation systems have no idea how to deal with buildings which are connected to a road, The road itself is overrated. This nothing more than a path ( You will learn that when you get more experienced) Actually there is a path going the other direction which connects the building with other dwellings. You mapped them on another changeset.
A hint. to measure if a trace is a road capable to be driven by cars (4track or more) the road must by wider than 2- 2,5 mtr. Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of that trace. type
ctr +shift+M shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Something to study if you didn't already

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view

I will not react any more on other changeset in this area but correct them
Best regards and keep mapping

Hello. As mentioned before, these are no buildings.
Also the square you mapped as park !!!
is not correct.I hope you were joking.
I remove these mappings
Have you read these documents?
#hotosm-project-7253 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust Kagera missing roads #mapwithai
and
osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards and keep mapping

Hello Aardash. This is the same situation as previous comment. I will remove these mappings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84151246

Hello Aadarsh, You asked for a review.
You just mapped 1 object as a building. I could not find any trace on this place (checked several imageries.) I do not know what makes you decide this is a building. Always check for a shadow. A building shows a shadow because it is above groundlevel. On the size of the shadow you can see the lenght (or the width) of that building. So If there is no shadow visible, 90 % change it isn't a building.
I will remove this mapping
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84151065

Hello, You asked for a review.
First of all, Thank you for mapping here.
I wander if you have read the guidance for road tagging in Tanzania, especial page 14 and around, what to map and what not.
You mapped quite a lot of highways, but , sorry for your time, quite a lot of unnecessary road/paths. (just ending in the fields)
Residential roads are situated in dense urban areas. Here you will find unclassified highways and paths.
I adjust ( remove a lot of) paths and retag highways
When a highway crosses another highway/path, be sure to connect the nodes to get a network. Crossing without a node is an error.
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84080211

Hello. You asked for a review. I commented on another changeset about squaring buildings.
Here you mapped/adjusted 178 buildings and none was properly squared. Please keep this in mind and square all your rectangular buildings
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84154700

Hello. I reviewed your mappings and found quite a number of poor mapped buildings, even not squared.
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping by following the outlines of the buildings. Not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings and square the buildings you map with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84150128

Hello Rara. Thanks for your reaction.
Please do not delete other mappers work. Leave that to the validators.
It is normal that mappings of a particular task has been mapped by different mappers.
Be sure when you start on an partial mapped task that you correct the offset.
Others mappings should be in line with the object behind it.
See the instructions how to do that.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
look for the correct offset section
best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83067992

Hello Rara, I reviewed this task as well.
4 building mapped very rough, oversized and not squared. See my previous message about squaring
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960964

Hello Rara. I reviewed this changeset as well.
What you see here are rocks I removed this mapping
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960992

Hello Rara. I reviewed your work. Please map more accurate. See this picture.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=12Q_rVozO99oQnH6QNa-DVqtappSTWNe8
The big square is not a building. You overlapped also a building , the top building exists out of 3 buildings.
And.... Do not forget to square the buildings you map.
Best regards and keep mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961722

I commented on the tag changing on slack
Best regards and keep mapping
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84199648

Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84128216

Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84127996

Hello. Thanks for mapping here
you asked for a review.
Some remarks.
The buildings you have mapped are rather inaccurate. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of buildings and square each rectangular building with the Q key in RapiD
Don't let nodes of different buildings, roads and other objects connect to each other
I squared the buildings involved for you
Best regards

Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Some remarks.
A number of the buildings you have mapped are rather inaccurate. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of buildings and square each rectangular building with the Q key in RapiD
Don't let nodes of different buildings, roads and other objects connect to each other
I squared the buildings involved for you
Best regards

Hello,
Please pay attention to the errors/warnings which show up on the issue triangle of the right hand menu.
Solve these issues if possible before uploading your work
another issue.
Thanks for mapping here

. Never use tag name:....
with an describing name like dirt road or rural building. and path, Leave it lo local mappers with knowledge about names.
See also This document how and where to map highways
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRe...
Best regards