OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
157954321 10 months ago

see my previous comment.
Here you clustered buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157954321

157953788 10 months ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157953788

157953948 10 months ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.
However, Most buildings are not squared! except the round buildings all buildings are square despite they sometimes looks not square. Just square these.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157953948

157954504 10 months ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
H: Included a yard of clearing.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157954504

157886409 10 months ago

Again about tagging of highways.
Don't tag highways in rural areas as residential.
See the wiki.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157886409

157887389 10 months ago

Hello.
See my comments about tagging of highways on another changeset.
The roads you tagged here have often a wrong tag.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157887389

157892155 10 months ago

You clustered here many buildings as well.
Each (cubical) building need to be mapped separately.
Best regards
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157892155

157893429 10 months ago

Please use the correct tagging of highways.
Get yourself familiar with this wiki

osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway

Very narrow traces are mostly paths.
Access roads to single buildings are mostly
'service' roads.
Best regards
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157893429

157885747 10 months ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157885747

157650748 10 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped quite a number of buildings as "heap" Why ?
Those objects are just buildings.
I retagged them
Best regards and keep mapping.

157174617 10 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct tag when you map highways in rural areas.
osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway

Tag residential is not to be used in rural areas as access to farms etc.
Best regards

157427411 10 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct tag when you map highways just giving access to farmland. track, rather than unclassified.

osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway
Best regards

157435693 10 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About the use of the tag 'service' road
This is what the wiki says
"highway=service Use only for single laned roads used to access highway services such as fuel stations"
See this wiki
osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway
Most of the service road you have mapped as access to a group of buildings should be tagged as residential in urban areas.
Best regards

157448309 10 months ago

Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings !
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings have to be mapped
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors)
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows so you see the height of a building as well.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping

157904331 10 months ago

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.
However, please square the buildings with the Q key while they are still selected.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904331

157558753 10 months ago

Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You added a layer to a few buildings and a -1 layer to a highway.
Why ? The buildings are building on the ground and the highway is not a tunnel. Please solve the issues rather than add layers to hide them,
Best regards

157304334 10 months ago

Thanks for mapping.
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings have to be mapped
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors)
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows so you see the height of a building as well.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

another issue. Each building need to be squared ( use the Q key while selected)
Best regards and keep mapping

157806174 10 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This task is invalidated.
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings have to be mapped
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors)
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows so you see the height of a building as well.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Another issue. All rectangular buildings need to be squared , ( Qkey while selected)

Best regards and keep mapping

157799929 11 months ago

Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map yards as buildings.
Check for a shadow if it is a building.
Don't include yards in a building as well.
Best regards and keep mapping

157616195 11 months ago

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM.
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157616195