No. I tried this and people still complain about country-sized or state-sized bboxes, except then they have 200 changesets to complain about. I hope we can all agree that that is pointless.

Ik heb de meeste paden teruggezet als informele paden in osm.org/changeset/141160251. Zie osm.org/changeset/139084809 voor de uitgebreidere discussie.

P.s. Als voorbeeld van zo'n voormalig pad, zie osm.org/way/991359023

De paden heb ik teruggezet in osm.org/changeset/141157204. Er staat nu informal=yes op.

De paden die ik met informal=yes heb getagd (zie dit plaatje: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/787052316649848832/1151102200815296582/image.png) komen als alles goed is netjes overeen met de verwijderde paden: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139084809

Paden die dichtgegroeid zijn kun je probleemloos veranderen in disused:highway=path. Dan verdwijnen ze voor iedere gebruiker van de kaart, maar mappers in het gebied kunnen nog wel zien dat dit een voormalig pad is.

Paden die nog wel bestaan mag je niet zomaar verwijderen wegens de genoemde OSM richtlijnen. Als er bij een specifiek pad expliciet "verboden toegang" staat, kun je er wel de tag access=no aan toevoegen. Dan worden mensen er met hun navigatie-apps niet meer overheen gestuurd.

Ciao! Grazie per tutte le tue modifiche, ma per favore non collegare i landuse con le linee centrali delle strade, poiché ció rende difficile editare le strade e i landuse separatamente.

Deze wijziging gaat in tegen de richtlijnen van OSM. De paden bestaan immers nog, maar alleen de officiële toegangsregels zijn veranderd. In deze situatie is de juiste oplossing om de paden te laten staan en er de tag informal=yes of een access=* tag aan toe te voegen.

De hele richtlijn staat beschreven op osm.wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Hallo. Op basis waarvan heb je zoveel paden hier verwijderd?

You can use this Overpass query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A1e

Or use Achavi if you're specifically interested in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140962068

@Javierpf No.

I tried this and people still complain about country-sized or state-sized bboxes, except then they have 200 changesets to complain about. I hope we can all agree that that is pointless.

This changeset is thematically very simple, so that should simplify the process of reviewing it.

P.s. At first I hadn't retagged the roof multipolygon to building=roof, and then the place looked like this: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/787052316649848832/1145855002334724196/image.png

I don't know if that's better, but you can look at the picture to compare it with the current look.

I currently made this out of it: osm.org/changeset/140515453

I separated the roof multipolygon from the building footprint that uses the type=building relation. The situation is unusual, but I think this will work. Let me know what you think about it.

Hi. Please don't add relations to relations. There are other ways to map this.

I am glad we could reach an agreement.

Have a good day :)

Hi Ecoutez,

Thank you for putting this place on the map. The way you mapped it looks good overall. I do have some feedback, if you don't mind:

Based on the healthcare:speciality tag that you added, I think you can also add the tag shop=hearing_aids (osm.wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhearing_aids).

The description you added is subjective and has the character of marketing language, which is something we would rather not have on the map.

The opening hours should follow a machine-readable syntax so OSM-based apps can use it. Documentation for that is here: osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours

Let me know if you have any questions, and feel free to reach out to any of the contact channels of the OSM community: osm.wiki/Contact_channels

Happy mapping!

You make a valid point that the PEC is something that can be mapped explicitly. Thank you for taking your time to explain this, and I apologise about my dismissive attitude from before.

"high quality products", on the other hand, is very subjective. Businesses can promote any products they sell as "high quality".
If you look for example at these Overpass results (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zl4), you'll see a lot of claims about high quality stuff that should be taken with a grain of salt. I hope you don't mind too much that I would like to remove that type of marketing-style language from the map.

Hoi Geoff,

Ik hoop dat osm.org/changeset/140284229 beter in de smaak valt.

I understand. Thank you for your efforts against the vandalism.

Hi. About the description of osm.org/node/10767927101, the text "Sells electrical pipes, joints, etc." is helpful, but the parts after that are subjective and unverifiable, and information about the owner is out of scope. Would you mind removing this?

Regards,

Casper

Hi NorthCrab. You might want to have a look at osm.org/way/873316158/history

Hi. What source do you have for the name of this island?