done

Are you sure that the merged road is
named River Side Drive ?

OK, thanks for the feedback and the correction.

I saw that you changed other parts of the relation
osm.org/relation/2317544
Still, two parts have invalid tags and might be ignored by data consumers:
osm.org/way/303489122
osm.org/way/354559053
Please let me know if I can help to fix the problem.

okay, so I'll revert all my changes and leave
highway="bus_stop CUS" untouched in the future until one finds a better way to tag that
element ?

no idea ?
See
osm.org/way/354559053

please review:
the tag highway=track;path
is invalid:
osm.org/way/296513044
Aerial images don't show the way,
so it requires local knowledge to fix
this.

I've changed it to residential and adjusted a few more roads , see
osm.org/changeset/35185889

no idea?
te rog revizuieste
osm.org/way/93588386
highway=path;track
nu e valid

okay, now I am really lost.
My understanding is that
physically_present=no
says I will not find a physical bus
stop pole. I understood your first
comment so that the bus stops there
if one gives a sign to the driver.
Did I get that wrong?

please review:
some of the roads were deleted
or changed by user albertoq,
I asked for a review but got no reply:
osm.org/changeset/35086990
Maybe you can help?

please review:
I just noted that the way
osm.org/way/72232789
is now without tags and is no longer member of any relation. I am not sure if the way is obsolete now or if the relation was corrupted.

please review:
the tag highway=footway;path
is invalid, I've changed it to path.
osm.org/way/25780388

please review:
I've changed the rarely used tag
highway=unclassified_link to unclassified
osm.org/changeset/35104902

Please review:
The tag highway=unclassified_link was rarely used is not documented, so I've changed it to unclassified to make sure that routing software will not ignore it:
osm.org/way/16160502

please review: I've changed the tag
highway=stepping_stones to
highway=path
and added a
ford=stepping_stones
See
osm.org/changeset/35105253
This change was also discussed here as an example for a "bad change" causing "data loss", so please let me know what you think about it:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-November/074913.html
See also
osm.wiki/Key:ford

Danke für die Rückmeldung :-)

welcome to OSM! Please review:
osm.org/way/379188743
is tagged highway=residential,unclassified.
which is invalid.
The way is short and connects two other residential roads, so it is probably also a residential road.
See osm.wiki/Key:highway for more details.
Unfortunately this wrong tagging is still supported by verion 1.7.4 of the editor iD,
so please take care and happy mapping ;-)

Hi, I've just added the tag highway=stepping_stones again.
Reg. my armchair mappings:
I try to be careful, I try to contact mappers
before or after a change asking for review.
I see no other way to reduce the number of tags which are not easy to understand
and I think that OSM should not contain
too many of them, esp. not with the highway key.

okay, this tag is used quite often together with bus_stop, so I think I'll just add it to those two bus_stops.