okay, There are a few more highway=junctions ways, I don't know if they
exist because of your proposal or not. I'll try to contact those mappers during the next days.

Ahh, okay. I didn't understand that part until now. That is in fact much more than
just naming a junction and I also
wondered why I have to connect roads
when no turn is allowed. On the other hand, you would not be warned when you add e.g. a sidewalk in this area without all connections, so it would also be a bit dangerous for those that don't understand the meaning of the junction area.

okay, thanks for the feedback :-)

thanks for the quick feedback :-)

Danke Dir. Sechs Jahre ist ja nicht soo lange, habe schon viel ältere Fehler gefunden, in dem ich mal in Taginfo die seltenen Tags durchgehe ;-)

:-)

please review:
I've reversed way osm.org/way/125629695
(again) and changed the tag
oneway=yes; -1
to oneway=yes
Was that what you tried to do?

okay, thanks for the quick feedback.
The tag poped up in my QA check, maybe change it to a note while the situation is unclear

please review:
oneway=yes; no
makes no sense
maxspeed=RO:urban; 50
better use only
maxspeed=RO:urban
osm.org/way/24995306
I guess you have merged two ways with these different attributes without
adjusting the values?

thanks for the quick feedback :-)

Maybe like in this proposal?
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/alternate_oneway

please explain:
what is meant with
oneway=advised ?
It is only used for two ways
osm.org/way/367728052 and
osm.org/way/69972762

please review:
I've changed oneway=np to oneway=no
osm.org/way/148399286

please review:
I guess oneway=np is just a typo and means oneway=no ?
osm.org/way/43620651
Bing shows a road that might be a oneway=yes

please review:
oneway="probably not"
on osm.org/way/317786087
and
osm.org/way/304646142
Do you know more now?

please review:
What was meant with
oneway=Marsh Lane
osm.org/way/351500357
I would guess name=Marsh Lane,
but that's the name of
osm.org/way/351500357
and service roads typically have no name.

please review:
I've removed the meaningless
oneway="-1;yes;no"
from
osm.org/way/218444706
It was produce by your merging of different
parts. Please change it of the way is a oneway.

please review:
I've changed oneway=t to oneway=yes
osm.org/way/101079134

please explain:
what does oneway=conditional mean ?
It is only used here.
See also
osm.wiki/Key:oneway

please review also
oneway=no;-1 on
osm.org/way/61402565