OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64627403 almost 7 years ago

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=ruins. Did you mean historic=ruins?

64632174 almost 7 years ago

Hi! Please check typo highway=p
osm.org/way/646095039
I don't see a highway there.

64622939 almost 7 years ago

Hallo!
Was ist mit highway=access gemeint?
Für mich sieht das nach einem highway=service aus.
osm.org/way/151176163

64320733 almost 7 years ago

I tried to correct it here:
osm.org/changeset/64622026
Please review.

64563459 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
You created some ways without tags here, they looks like residential roads to me.
There are some roads with highway=track, did you use that because they are unpaved? If they are residential roads you should use surface=unpaved or similar to map that.
There is also one with highway=trackr
which is not yet connected to the road network.
osm.org/way/645263966
Please try to correct this.

64582095 almost 7 years ago

Hi! Why did you change a part of the track to highway=guessed_track?
Bing shows a way close to the way, so I wonder what to do.
osm.org/way/645428209

64551030 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
You use highway=barrier here, a very unusual tag. I think what you meant is a kerb? See osm.wiki/Key:kerb
One of the ways is here:
osm.org/way/645143414

64400414 almost 7 years ago

OK, seems I did not find the right words, so I've now corrected the other error:
osm.org/changeset/64565746

64477503 almost 7 years ago

Hi! I fixed typo highway=designated on
osm.org/way/644339156
The ways next to it were highway=path and highway=cycleway. I think path fits best, so I changed it like that:
osm.org/changeset/64554821

64516845 almost 7 years ago

Möglicherweise lag es an JOSM, scheint eine total veraltete Version zu sein.

64516845 almost 7 years ago

Moin! Was ist denn da schiefgegangen?
highway=3 + footway=Beton an einem Weg mit Länge 0?
osm.org/way/644748882
An der gleichen Stelle ist dann auch noch ein zweiter Weg osm.org/way/644748773

64400414 almost 7 years ago

So far only for the first way. Did you find out what went wrong? I am just curious because there might be an error in JOSM. If so, it should be reported and fixed.

64400414 almost 7 years ago

Oops, I just noticed that there is a second way on top of the other, so you have to download the area, not a single way.

64400414 almost 7 years ago

If you download this way and run the validator JOSM should complain. If it doesn't you probably clicked on the Ignore button.
Try to remove the file validator\ignorederrors.

64400414 almost 7 years ago

Any idea what went wrong? I guess you did not intend to produce these nodes.

64373751 almost 7 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. There are still a few more:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/DGc

64475173 almost 7 years ago

Yes, OK. Next time watch out for the typo.

64452091 almost 7 years ago

The picture shows lamps on the sidewalk and lamps on the major road. Still, they are all rather normal lamps, so I would map them as nodes.

64378572 almost 7 years ago

Hi! You changed highway=track to the unusual highway=unsurfaced here
osm.org/way/146708704
Was that intended?

64452091 almost 7 years ago

Hi! Please check way osm.org/way/643894897
I think you wanted to draw two single nodes instead?
You should also add the tag lit=yes to the corresponding stretch of osm.org/way/560468809