Street just changed from two way to one way
ߊ߬ ߟߊߦߟߍ߬ߣߍ߲߬ ߦߋ߫ Glassman ߓߟߏ߫ 27 May 2011 ߦߋ߫ English ߟߋ߬ ߘߐ߫I was on the way to a meeting downtown taking my usual route. Entering the downtown area my normal route was now one way, going the wrong direction. On the way back I discovered that the street was just converted. Workers were in the process of redoing the signal lights. The lanes had already been repainted.
I made the change to OSM. Certainly faster than any of the commercial maps. However, the street has an entrance to I5 express lanes. These are time dependent. In the morning they lead into the city and out in the afternoon. But I can't find anything on the wiki that tells me how to show the TOD direction.
Since I'm new I'll ask on the newbie mailing list.
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ JohnSmith ߟߊ߫ 27 May 2011 at 05:42 ߘߐ߫
osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ lezurdis ߟߊ߫ 27 May 2011 at 08:44 ߘߐ߫
I didn't found (yet) how to deal with access restriction that change with time.
There's date or time validity for access restriction and for turn restriction :
osm.wiki/Key:access#Access_time_restrictions
osm.wiki/Restriction
But how to deal with reversed highway ?
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ 42429 ߟߊ߫ 27 May 2011 at 11:31 ߘߐ߫
There is one time-dependent oneway road in Hamburg (the orange one):
osm.org/?lat=53.577663&lon=10.010574&zoom=18
Currently, the syntax is:
oneway=yes:0h-4h;yes:12h-24h;-1:4h-12h (-1=reverse direction)
However, I don't know whether any router can deal with this syntax.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ compdude ߟߊ߫ 27 May 2011 at 16:05 ߘߐ߫
Not sure how to do this either. It has never occurred to me as an issue.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Ethan O'Connor ߟߊ߫ 30 May 2011 at 01:33 ߘߐ߫
Ah, I've tried to deal with this same entrance before, Glassman! It's somehow reassuring that I wasn't overlooking something obvious. The syntax FK270673 describes makes sense to me at first glance and certainly conveys sufficient information to accurately describe the situation.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Ethan O'Connor ߟߊ߫ 30 May 2011 at 01:33 ߘߐ߫
Ah, I've tried to deal with this same entrance before, Glassman! It's somehow reassuring that I wasn't overlooking something obvious. The syntax FK270673 describes makes sense to me at first glance and certainly conveys sufficient information to accurately describe the situation.