Not vandalised, but it had been modified previously by someone who didn’t agree to the new licence, and the Redaction Bot has removed their contributions. See for example this way: osm.org/browse/way/18677320
The road intersection was totally distorted into a zick-zack like chaos. This was caused by the redaction bot how I have learned. It has been fixed by someone in the meantime.
Discussion
Awennit n EdLoach di 17 July 2012 ɣef 12:01
Not vandalised, but it had been modified previously by someone who didn’t agree to the new licence, and the Redaction Bot has removed their contributions. See for example this way: osm.org/browse/way/18677320
Awennit n Vincent de Phily di 17 July 2012 ɣef 12:16
There’s going to be plenty more like this to take care of. It’s a pain, but a necessary one and we’ll be glad to be on the other side.
Once the bot has finished processing the area, go ahead and “remap” the broken bits as well as you can.
Awennit n compdude di 21 July 2012 ɣef 22:24
Was this supposed to be marked as an under-construction/ proposed road or what?
Awennit n IOOI di 22 July 2012 ɣef 02:37
@compdude
The road intersection was totally distorted into a zick-zack like chaos. This was caused by the redaction bot how I have learned. It has been fixed by someone in the meantime.