Not vandalised, but it had been modified previously by someone who didn’t agree to the new licence, and the Redaction Bot has removed their contributions. See for example this way: osm.org/browse/way/18677320
The road intersection was totally distorted into a zick-zack like chaos. This was caused by the redaction bot how I have learned. It has been fixed by someone in the meantime.
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ EdLoach ߟߊ߫ 17 July 2012 at 12:01 ߘߐ߫
Not vandalised, but it had been modified previously by someone who didn’t agree to the new licence, and the Redaction Bot has removed their contributions. See for example this way: osm.org/browse/way/18677320
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Vincent de Phily ߟߊ߫ 17 July 2012 at 12:16 ߘߐ߫
There’s going to be plenty more like this to take care of. It’s a pain, but a necessary one and we’ll be glad to be on the other side.
Once the bot has finished processing the area, go ahead and “remap” the broken bits as well as you can.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ compdude ߟߊ߫ 21 July 2012 at 22:24 ߘߐ߫
Was this supposed to be marked as an under-construction/ proposed road or what?
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ IOOI ߟߊ߫ 22 July 2012 at 02:37 ߘߐ߫
@compdude
The road intersection was totally distorted into a zick-zack like chaos. This was caused by the redaction bot how I have learned. It has been fixed by someone in the meantime.