Are you against splitting where divided? I wouldn't disagree, but it'd be quite a big change in GTA

It's physically separated here though?

Ah thanks! I'll note. I can't recall what exactly I intended for that way. Perhaps that it's only suitable for foot, and not for example for cycling? What would the proper combination be then - perhaps foot=yes + bicycle=no? access=no + foot=yes tends to render it as private in the main osm.org layer which discourages me from that option.

still wrong lol...

Hi,

The proposed alignment for Ontario Line has been given a bit more detail. Would you update the routes you drew? See https://blog.metrolinx.com/2019/07/25/metrolinx-and-infrastructure-ontario-release-initial-business-case-for-ontario-line-subway/

Also minor things like two bike share stations. Could not find Mapillary of some express bus stops like Adelaide/Yonge and Church/Lombard, so didn't add them

mini_roundabout tags removed in osm.org/changeset/72221232

osm.org/node/1416834955 is not what a highway=mini_roundabout is in OSM. mini_roundabout is a road junction without a raised central island but nevertheless subject to roundabout-like traffic flow (traffic entering must yield).

A "round area of paving stones" should be mapped as a round closed way with appropriate highway tag and area=yes.

POI updates not exhaustive, I didn't really pay attention to ones I haven't updated here

+1 and thanks for upgrading the main roads in GTA - that's been bothering me for a while. Having Hwy 7 the same as any street downtown was ridiculous

I see that transit route relations remained broken. Sorry... Might try to fix them at some point

Hi Jonathan,

Your edit added level crossings between a subway line and several footpaths. Did you mean to do this? We don't have level crossings of rapid transit lines in Toronto.

This change makes osm.org/node/3600915103 a bit of a joke. It really is signed only "TD".

Please also use slightly more verbose changeset messages.

You've added the proposed extension to the main route relation osm.org/relation/102386

I don't think that's correct

Some of these are wrong, could you please correct them?

Hi, did you mean to leave a gap in Eglinton Avenue near osm.org/#map=19/43.69956/-79.43191 by deleting osm.org/way/446073986/history or was this accidental?

see osm.org/note/1823403

Quick update on Broadview: I've confirmed in survey that the streetcar track layout at intersections is still as shown in Esri imagery. I haven't had time to split the tracks yet, and first I'll be doing an update of buildings and POIs closer to the Queen end. I might be able to do the tracks around early next week, but if you're interested and have time now go for it (no worries if you don't).

the little free library still needs retagging