Dit lijkt vergelijkbaar met Striep (Terschelling). Driel is niet bijster bekend buiten Nederland, en zal geen naamsbekendheid genieten in het buitenland.

Namen in andere talen moeten wel echt bestaan als exoniem. Arnhem bijvoorbeeld zou je kunnen toevoegen als je een geschikte bron kan vinden (niet alleen de Arabische Wikipedia), maar Driel?

Het punt is dat je niet zelf als vertaler kan gaan optreden op OpenStreetMap. Dat lijk je hier wel te doen. Gebruik je Arabische taalvaardigheid voor het uitbreiden van de name-tags op plaatsen waar dat relevant is (grote steden met name), maar ga geen vertalingen maken.

This building contains a church, but it almost certainly wasn't built as a church. For the building-tag, the building's original purpose and appearance counts, not its function.

If there is a congregation here, use amenity=place_of_worship.

By the way, did you read the message that accompanied your ban? Could you take some time to participate in this discussion?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/blind-qa-edits-tagging-qa-revert/125483/

It would be nice to hear from you that you understand the issue at hand there.

Zie ook:

osm.org/changeset/162234488#map=16/52.86338/5.73546

Je pakte daar in eerste instantie de verkeerde tag.

Zoals eerder aangegeven: gebruik dan highway=footway. Nu sta je alsnog paarden en brommers toe.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/162328063.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/162328063.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/162328063.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/162328063.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/162328063.

He's been doing this for a while, whilst completely ignoring changeset comments. I'm trying to get a response, but if this fails I'm reporting him for vandalism.

Blindly accepting ID's quick-fixes often breaks or erases valid mapping and should not be used without understanding what is being changed.

In this changeset you seem to be updating POIs which no longer exist under that name. Are you just blindly applying quick-fixes from ID?

Please tell us what you did in your changeset comments. Just 'tagging qa' doesn't tell your fellow mappers anything. If you're adding missing wikidata-tags to operator-tags, say so!

This is the second time I'm seeing you erase valid shop names because you are blindly applying some quick fix suggested for perceived QA-errors:

osm.org/node/12244694147#map=19/52.845678/5.710296

Look at that shop's website:

https://www.gall.nl/winkels/details/lemmer-schoolstraat-12

They are indeed calling that shop 'Gall&Gall gemak', so why are you changing that name?

By the way, the last time you edited things in this area and deleted valid data you never bothered to respond:

osm.org/changeset/160199513

Are you unaware of these comments, or are you just taking the piss?

Top!

Doe dat dan ook voor de pedestrian area waar deze overheen loopt, en de twee voetpaden en de ingang van het museum.

Certainly, they need separate objects. The mapper who added the bridge outline made a mistake there (which you found). Depending on how large the water already is, either join, or keep them as two separate but touching objects. Many mappers put such a meeting edge under bridges somewhere in the middle.

Nothing wrong with man_made=bridge. It shows the exact dimensions of the bridge and acts as the identity-object for the real-life bridge.

The point is the water here is now cut in two with a gap in between.

Did you look at the whole situation here, or did you only look at the tags? Someone mistakenly added the bridge outline to a bit of water, and now you have removed all the water under the bridge.

You fixed one problem and created another.

Typfout: highway=footway dus.

Dan kun je beter highway=path vervangen door highway=foot, anders mag je er qua data nog steeds met een brommer rijden, of een paard.