JesseFTW's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
161506546 | 7 months ago | Thank you for adding this house in Orem, but you also added some random lines without tags in Romania, thereby making a VERY large changset bounding box. Please be more careful not to do that! I've removed the lines. |
161432938 | 7 months ago | Looks like this changeset was a lot larger than you meant it to be. :-) |
161327525 | 7 months ago | Please be more careful not to create such a large changeset bounding box. Talk to your supervisor at Facebook if you have questions. Thanks! |
161324355 | 7 months ago | Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Also, a more detailed changeset comment would be helpful. :-) Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
161249070 | 7 months ago | While this generally looks fine, a more descriptive changeset comment would be helpful! Also, you deleted a number of ways then re-created them, making it harder to understand the history -- please try not to do that. In any case, thanks for making the updates! |
161156668 | 7 months ago | It looks like this changeset included a larger area than you might have meant. :-) Unless all of these changes were fixing the East Coast Greenway? |
161186754 | 7 months ago | Oh I'm so glad you did this. I'd been seeing these out of date buildings on the map every time I'd go to Mahoney's, and kept forgetting to actually go and fix them. Much thanks for resolving my note and getting that done. |
161186584 | 7 months ago | Thanks for adding these! In the future, to link notes and changesets, you can put the whole URL, that way it will be clickable. (It'd be nice if changeset #123 was clickable, but that hasn't been implemented yet.) |
160949044 | 8 months ago | Ah, there's no need to revert the change on the bench -- assuming it was correct, it's fine. The issue is just that the changes were together in one changeset, and there's nothing to be done about this one; it's just something to watch for in the future. If you change the settings in StreetComplete to upload only when you tell it to, that can help. |
160922236 | 8 months ago | Ah, that makes a lot of sense! Check on osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment for an existing tag that might work. And if it doesn't, feel free to make up a new tag that isn't used yet and just apply it yourself. |
160922236 | 8 months ago | Looks like this was fixed by another editor in osm.org/changeset/160942436 |
160949044 | 8 months ago | As you might have noticed, it looks like StreetComplete accidentally included changes on both sides of the Atlantic in this changeset. I'm sure you already know to avoid this, but just in case: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
160933198 | 8 months ago | As you might have noticed, it looks like StreetComplete accidentally included changes on both sides of the Atlantic in this changeset. I'm sure you already know to avoid this, but just in case: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
160922236 | 8 months ago | I think this changeset broke the coastline, due to the unconnected ways tagged with natural=coastline. I'm confused about what you were intending here? |
159666897 | 8 months ago | Oh that's a *WONDERFULLY* useful resource -- I'll add it to the (newly created) wiki page: osm.wiki/Woburn,_Massachusetts . And it makes sense about the sign getting hit and not replaced yet. |
153552465 | 8 months ago | All good -- sometimes things get moved by accident. Thanks for all your work surveying and adding details around Woburn! |
160494442 | 8 months ago | Oy. That's a lovely 'feature'. Good to know! |
160883543 | 8 months ago | No worries -- thanks for adding the townships at all ; it prompted me to look into them, which was fun. |
160883543 | 8 months ago | And it should be fixed now (I hope!) |
160723183 | 8 months ago | That makes a lot of sense! If/when you get a chance, updating the wiki with the above notes would be great. For now, I've linked this changeset on the talk page. |