Komяpa's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
9518887 | over 1 year ago | Hi, it was there before, I only changed capitalization there (12 years ago, oh my!). Yes, it likely is a better way, please change if you believe so. |
77785078 | over 5 years ago | Question about need of this revert was raised in https://t.me/byosm |
77785078 | over 5 years ago | Hello, why was this changeset reverted without discussion with local communities? |
62638543 | about 6 years ago | привет! скорее всего, это не дома в лесу - надо как-то иначе обозначить? |
66713032 | over 6 years ago | Hi, I did not follow Vilniaus g. so can't tell much about it. Choice of route via center of Reformatu parkas is not optimal, as it is not lit at night.
First turn from the start would better be to Pylimo g, as it has wide pedestrian footpath along it. We had to jump away from cars on the hill of Vingriu g. I'm inclined to revert your revert and raise a discussion on changing the norm of mapping pedestrian routes with Lithuanian community. Would you mind pointing me to where the "Lithuanian" rules of mapping footways are fixed and where such discussion took place last time? |
66713032 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Currently pedestrian route is not working efficiently because of your revert. Here are the routes: Graphhopper:
OSRM:
Both decide to avoid Pylimo g. as it is high-class automobile highway. The natural way of fixing it adopted in many places is to map the pedestrian footwalks around the highway, so the router can properly count the crossings and traffic lights. The footwalks are present on the ground and I personally walked on them. |
66713032 | over 6 years ago | Hello Tomas, I've been to the city and the route I've mapped was not correctly built by maps.me. What is "Lithuanian rules" you're talking about, and why exactly this needs a revert? |
65756349 | over 6 years ago | Привет! город можно не добавлять, он в адресе, как и страна, подразумевается уже тем, что вокруг есть полигон place=city. |
65738276 | over 6 years ago | Hi, why are you redrawing osm.org/way/54936749 into a relation? It can be a way by itself. |