Komяpa's hozzászólásai
Módosításcsomag | Mikor | Hozzászólás |
---|---|---|
9518887 | több mint 1 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, it was there before, I only changed capitalization there (12 years ago, oh my!). Yes, it likely is a better way, please change if you believe so. |
77785078 | több mint 5 évvel ezelőtt | Question about need of this revert was raised in https://t.me/byosm |
77785078 | több mint 5 évvel ezelőtt | Hello, why was this changeset reverted without discussion with local communities? |
62638543 | nagyjából 6 évvel ezelőtt | привет! скорее всего, это не дома в лесу - надо как-то иначе обозначить? |
66713032 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, I did not follow Vilniaus g. so can't tell much about it. Choice of route via center of Reformatu parkas is not optimal, as it is not lit at night.
First turn from the start would better be to Pylimo g, as it has wide pedestrian footpath along it. We had to jump away from cars on the hill of Vingriu g. I'm inclined to revert your revert and raise a discussion on changing the norm of mapping pedestrian routes with Lithuanian community. Would you mind pointing me to where the "Lithuanian" rules of mapping footways are fixed and where such discussion took place last time? |
66713032 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, Currently pedestrian route is not working efficiently because of your revert. Here are the routes: Graphhopper:
OSRM:
Both decide to avoid Pylimo g. as it is high-class automobile highway. The natural way of fixing it adopted in many places is to map the pedestrian footwalks around the highway, so the router can properly count the crossings and traffic lights. The footwalks are present on the ground and I personally walked on them. |
66713032 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Hello Tomas, I've been to the city and the route I've mapped was not correctly built by maps.me. What is "Lithuanian rules" you're talking about, and why exactly this needs a revert? |
65756349 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Привет! город можно не добавлять, он в адресе, как и страна, подразумевается уже тем, что вокруг есть полигон place=city. |
65738276 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, why are you redrawing osm.org/way/54936749 into a relation? It can be a way by itself. |
64553747 | több mint 6 évvel ezelőtt | Адрес БЦ - Кирова, 8, именование 8/4 - копия из гуглкарт, в которых кто-то проставил по аналогии и теперь никак не исправить. 8 корпус 4 - вот то длинное здание на территории Динамо, приведшее к локальному уберопокалипсису после сдачи, потому что вместо БЦ Kiroff все стали приезжать туда. |
49687437 | majdnem 8 évvel ezelőtt | Hello, We have a set of traces where driver follows this way. If this segment is absent in graph, we won't be able to correctly snap these traces to road graph. How about adding access=private to this line, so that routing doesn't follow it, but we're able to get the traces snapped? |
48551601 | majdnem 8 évvel ezelőtt | Hi! Please so not remove the service road spikes on the edges of the parking - these are essential for functioning of ride sharing services' airport queues and geofencing. |
44806257 | több mint 8 évvel ezelőtt | привет!
|
44677394 | több mint 8 évvel ezelőtt | Hello! You've changed New York City boundary to be a road. I'll revert this change. Please be careful in future. Thanks! |
44547860 | több mint 8 évvel ezelőtt | Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, не удаляйте корректные данные из OpenStreetMap. Тротуары в OpenStreetMap приветствуются: osm.wiki/RU:%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B Правка откачена: osm.org/changeset/44550045 |
43349476 | több mint 8 évvel ezelőtt | *in future :) |
43349476 | több mint 8 évvel ezelőtt | Hello, You've changed New York City boundary to be a 'route'. I'll fix this back - please be careful in |
41588095 | majdnem 9 évvel ezelőtt | @sergeybe
хорошего вечера! |
41588095 | majdnem 9 évvel ezelőtt | @sergeybe вы нарушаете конвенцию по борьбе с вандализмом, пункт
полный текст:
пожалуйста, ведите себя подобающим образом :) |
41588095 | majdnem 9 évvel ezelőtt | @sergeybe будьте вежливее, пожалуйста. нормальная же правка, особенно, для первой. |