osm.org/changeset/72080149

osm.org/changeset/72080149

Whatever the right name tagging name is, you can't simply delete that old one. Please change the tags accordingly to preserve it.

Then don't refer to "per HK Government GeoInfo Map" as a source.

Anyway, much gratitude to mapping traffic signal codes in fact. They are kind of ignored.

You want to use a more informative changeset description (words like "test" gets flagged too). Also as in your previous changeset, use `ref`, not `name` for traffic signal codes.

We use `name` for named junctions, for example in Japan. Use `ref` for these codes.

Why would you do this?

Please don't do this.

You can't do that. Copyright violation.

What do you mean by no such trail exists? Can you assess the lifecycle status?

Can you explain why Ping Yeung Roundabout is `residential`?

osm.org/changeset/71984160

You also forgot to edit this.

osm.org/way/450176244

This would wrongly mean pedestrians can pass the fence. Mapping barrier entrances is the method.

Do you have any problems with tagging access?

Please don't remove tags without correcting the tagging.

There are many mistakes here. Do you have any experience with HK before?
1. A guideline in HK is that `motorway` follows Expressway area, and `trunk` follows Strategic Routes. Your edits fail to follow this principle.
2. Before Route 10 is implemented, these will not be `trunk` by virtue of road function either.
3. Shun Long Road can't possibly have two southern main lines. It's clear one is a forking bypass, and the other a reverse branch.

That doesn't sound right. It would simply mean it's `access=no`. Are you sure vehicles physically can't travel on them?