OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83970580 over 5 years ago

Don't remove street details from a sidewalk
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970580

83970389 over 5 years ago

Some of them for example are different, physically separated
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389

83970389 over 5 years ago

Please don't remove sidewalks.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389

83970011 over 5 years ago

How are these `=suburb`?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970011

83969658 over 5 years ago

Don't remove names from `landuse=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969658

83969110 over 5 years ago

Wrong English name
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969110

83968992 over 5 years ago

This should be converted into address
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83968992

83913071 over 5 years ago

Please don't remove wrongly tagged information by deleting it only.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83913071

83909478 over 5 years ago

Can you explain if it is not a flush toilet? Don't tag for the renderer to "change icon".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909478

83909308 over 5 years ago

Don't tag an extra `building=*` into it if it is a part of a structure. It would be considered a `building:part=` or `indoor=`.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909308

83907929 over 5 years ago

Should it not be `building:levels=41`, including the podium base?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83907929

83870609 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83870609

83870199 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83870199

83868859 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83868859

83868607 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83868607

83867897 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.

83867544 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83867544

83867544 over 5 years ago

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83867544

83849503 over 5 years ago

How is Nga Tsin Wai a `=neighborhood`?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83849503

83848926 over 5 years ago

1. "Central District" is different from "Central".
2. Tong Mi should be ok, and Un Chau is acceptable to me, but Om Yau and them may be debated by others.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83848926