OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
86782125 about 5 years ago

1. osm.org/way/249896430 is the final decision point leading to Tunnel Area. It shows R2 in direction.
2. osm.org/way/249895837 does not continue onto R2, nor show R2 in the direction gantry sign.
3. osm.org/way/88008410 does not continue onto R2, nor show R2 on the direction signs either.

86828129 about 5 years ago

Your changeset is not where you should expect people to look at for discussion
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86828129

86781093 about 5 years ago

Please notice the left lane continues for a short section before merging with the main line after the yield
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86781093

86782125 about 5 years ago

Please re-read previous discussion
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86782125

86781752 about 5 years ago

Please notice Kwai Chung Rd follows from the `highway=secondary` section. It doesn't suddenly become `=primary`
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86781752

86634019 about 5 years ago

Also please don't sneak in edits from `phone=` and `email=` to `contact:*=`

86629406 about 5 years ago

There's no physical separation there. It should be modeled by `change:lanes=` and other tags
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86629406

86634019 about 5 years ago

Please notice `website=` and `contact:website=` have different value. `addr:country=CN` is obviously wrong as well.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86634019

86623276 about 5 years ago

Please don't remove the connection between `highway=pedestrian` and the major road
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86623276

86622728 about 5 years ago

Please don't remove `crossing=traffic_signals`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86622728

86585496 about 5 years ago

Please check where /way/249896430 leads to.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86585496

86585612 about 5 years ago

Please check the routing carefully before you use random, irrelevant examples
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86585612

86591490 about 5 years ago

This is not correct. You can walk inside.

86473273 about 5 years ago

No you don't, and they shouldn't. Do you know what you are talking about?

86577991 about 5 years ago

If you think you are right, you clearly know nothing about how to use "_link" overall, how it is applied here, and what other tunnel connections look like

86577991 about 5 years ago

osm.org/changeset/86356680

86473273 about 5 years ago

osm.org/changeset/86356680

86577991 about 5 years ago

Do you really understand the concept of "_link" when you didn't change them fully?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86577991

86473273 about 5 years ago

Note the use of `highway=motorway_link`.

86577991 about 5 years ago

This is definitely more wrong because it doesn't show the relationship with Tunnel Area. Please don't go revert other's changeset as a new editor if you don't know what you are doing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86577991