Don't remove future attributes for temporary parking

This seems to be a valid name for a common location of martial arts filmmaking. It only needs to be changed from `place=locality` to something else that's a more specific feature .

Mistakened entry on `addr:postcode=`

`is_in:*=` is not deprecated when there's not `boundary=administrative`

Please check that osm.org/way/903219716/ is Area 1E, not Site 1E1.

It appears that there's no physical island here, so it was left as a single line without splitting.

This meaning it is topologically similar to a collector-distributor roadway.
Also I don't see why the section outside the Administration Building should not be `=service`

Outisde of your changeset comment, aside from not seeing why Lantau Link to Tsing Yi is `=secondary`, there's a difference here in that the entre Lantau Link Visitor Centre and Administrative Area road network/zone can only be accessed by `=motorway`, hence contributing to its status as a `=motorway_link`. For comparison, Ma On Shan Rd bus gate allows all bus (not franchised bus only), so I let it be.

Are you sure?

(`=living_street` also requires explicit pedestrian priority)

`traffic_calming=table` should be used instead. Re-tagging the section of crosswalk to `=living_street` is not correct, and there seems to be no indication it's priority crosswalk (a la zebra-crossing). These would "informal"/courtesy crossings only.

Can you explain what's Muk Chui St, and all the straightening?

Please check that `power=substation` is on the perimeter osm.org/way/849337852. Although, `service=` and `utility=` has been added, I put `power=yes` there in case.

What happened to the skybridge?

1. It's not necessary to add NT since there's already already a `boundary=administrative`.
2. `addr:province=` and `addr:district=` would be a mismatch, since HK is a state/"province" level, and it's Tuen Mun District. `addr:suburb=` should be used for So Kwun Wat.
3. I prefer `addr:town=` over `addr:city=` to keep it consistent, with the new towns being `place=town`
4. It's not neccessary to the same higher level address to individual buildings inside the area. Tagging on the premise is sufficient.
5. I consider `operator=` to be the managing company. I don't believe Vanke is the management here? It would be a developer, or perhaps `owner=`

Again, please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`. EVA is not a name. This is Tagging For Renderer. Some other map data appears to do this because they are based on paper maps, or have limited functionality. It will only be a name if it has proper, eg "Club Le Pont". Smething like "Le Pont Clubhouse" would be objectionable if it is not used formally, ie only "Clubhouse" is shown on signs.

to make it work

1. Please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`. EVA is not a name. This is Tagging For Renderer. Some other map data appears to do this because they are based on paper maps, or have limited functionality. `motor_vehicle:conditional=designated @ (emergency)` + `parking:lane:both=fire_lane` makes it functional. In this case `service=emergency_access` can be debatable, since it has other functions.
2. Don't draw separate lines for a mini-roundabout. Only do this for normal roundabouts with physical separation island in the center

Please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`, not a name. You should add `leisure=track` + `sport=running`

osm.org/changeset/98473771#map=17/22.34506/114.05771