Kovoschiz's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
155676983 | 12 months ago | Where else has it been discussed, and what's the "consensus"? No one here agreed with you. |
156262744 | 12 months ago | Please avoid adding `crossing:island=no` for divided roads which has been split. The status of them is unclear. |
156254567 | 12 months ago | I would like to mention using `route=highway` for this would be perfect for the purposes in HK. I believe there are actually no "street name" for it. Only the tunnel structure is named for itself, and for Tunnel Area according to the Road Tunnels (Government) Ordinance. Government records seem to have a mistake, or procedure problem. |
156249387 | 12 months ago | I suggest to instead use `route=highway` for roads split into multiple sections for addressing purposes. This also matches how there are no "street" named Prince Edward Rd on its own. |
156254423 | 12 months ago | `=street` should be used for all road names, especially in Hong Kong. There are in fact no "road names" in HK, only street names. These "Highway" use the same street name signs. They can have address assigned, ie 668 Tsing Sha Hwy for the Administration Building, and 7 Lion Rock Tunnel Rd. |
156229869 | 12 months ago | Please avoid deleting directly. What that easily causes is you forgetting to add `crossing:island=yes` back. |
156207813 | 12 months ago | `route=tram` is for the route of each actual tram service line. This needs to be either `type=network` , or `route=railway` |
156208235 | 12 months ago | 2. `loc_name:yue-Latn-jyutping=` |
156208235 | 12 months ago | 2. The only things you could add is `name:yue-Latn-jyutping=` for the romanization, and `loc_name:etymology=` . But they still aren't very needed. Especially the latter you can add on Wikidata. . osm.wiki/Key:name:etymology |
156208235 | 12 months ago | 1. Please use `loc_name=` , as this is not the most "common" , nor an officially recognized name. I don't know if you are from Hong Kong, but even people here may not know there's a specific legal meaning to streets and street names. `name=` should be reserved for that. It's the one signposted on street name signs, which is also the decisive factor for `name=` from the ground-truth principle in OSM.
|
156162145 | 12 months ago | (Not to mention this is a `=pedestrian` street) |
156162145 | 12 months ago | Please don't use `route=foot` . That's for signposted walking routes. A `=footway` should still use `type=street` (not `type=route` + `route=street` ) when it's named on its own. |
156087737 | 12 months ago | And changing to `=footway` here... |
156087737 | 12 months ago | You are suspected of vandalism. False upload comments. Changing `tourism=hotel` + `building=hotel` to `=restaurant` , and adding unrelated `surface=grass` . |
156087474 | 12 months ago | No, it's not `amenity=stadium_seating` |
156087442 | 12 months ago | Why are you deleting it? |
156087200 | 12 months ago | !. Your upload comment is false. I don't see any `=hospital` .
|
156086970 | 12 months ago | What is this nonsense? Why are you changing `building=apartments` to `landuse=` ? |
155676983 | 12 months ago | Also there's another option https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/lit=dusk-dawn |
156065180 | 12 months ago | @ Mateusz Konieczny
|