Please don't delete directly, as they still represent a store space. This makes tracking and updating more difficult. Change it to a plaint "Point", or "Vacant".

Maps.me spam, wrong `shop=` and coords osm.org/relation/15079293

2. You can see there is some structure in between. So it shouldn't be removed.
3. The `phone=` format should have the subscriber number unseparated, as separating will cause the 2nd part to be seen as an area code which HK doesn't have.

The whole outline should be kept, as the center is only one `=post_depot` itself. Only 2 blocks.
Also it depends on how this should be expressed. If they are 2 different `building=` , `building=` not `building:part=` should be used. If they are 2 `building:part=` , a `building=` outline is needed to cover all of them.

2. You broke the northern LPH area

You are allowed to visit the shopping center. It's not `=private`

Doesn't seem a wrongly positioned `=shelter`

Why should this be directly deleted? Besides, the `building=` is `man_made=tower` , showing it has some meaning.

It's very common to have roads passing through buildings. Please don't assume this is a mistake.

It's possible there's a passageway in between that can be walked through. Please don't directly delete without checking.

You merged an `office=` into a `railway=buffer_stop`

Please don't upload personal-use data. This is a live public database. It is considered vandalism.

This doesn't make sense. Either the `entrance=` should be removed, or the `building=` shape should be corrected. The `building=` is correct. In fact, the `=footway` is `indoor=yes` , meaning both are correct. The `=footway` should only be split.

Please don't remove valid info. It needs to be improved as different `building:part=` correctly.

A `=parking_entrance` should not be on the intersecting point between the sidewalk. It should be on the `building=`

This is obviously visible on imagery. The road continues on the podium. Please don't fix for validators.

Please don't make groundless assumptions. The road passes under the tower. It already has `tunnel=building_passage` . It's not wrong.

I don't mean "fork" is a diverge. Sai Sha Rd westbound is special. To be precise, you have to travel through a section of the MOS Bypass first. Only the eastbound follows the old bypassed alignment directly.

As I said, let's not continue arguing which one is the fork of the other one. The junction is a fork, where a road continues on the other side. It's not only a slip road connecting with an interchange.

No, I have never said anything about history. Please don't make guesses and assumptions.
MOS Bypass is forked from it, while it's configured as main route. Let's ignore the order if it's confusing.
The junction is a fork. MOS Rd continues down. So it doesn't need to be be a `highway=*_link`