You haven't added back `electricity=solar` , meaning this is a loss of info eg osm.org/node/4131212886/history

Don't edit and upload here for personal use. This is a live public database. Please use actual applications. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

5. Don't duplicate `ref=` into `note=` and `short_name=`

1. Don't add your own advertisements to `description=`
2. Don't delete other `shop=` directly, which contains addresses, and still represent a store space. Change it to a plain "point".
3. Don't move objects wildly. Create another object for different locations
4. Don't add other info in `branch=` .
4.

The `=service` road obviously doesn't connect with the `=footway` . I haven't edited whether it's for Wu Chung House's carpark, loading zone, or private.

1. `vehicle=no` has already been added

1. `=permit` doesn't mean "except permit". It means always granted ones. Exceptionally and case-by-case ones are `=private` .
2. The Au Tau roundabout flyover is the through route of Caste Peak Rd. Therefore it's not made a `=*_link` .

Don't upload test edits to a live public non-test database. This is considered vandalism.

For Tunnel Area, Heung Yuen Wai Hwy has no `ref=` either. The continuity issue is found on Lion Rock Tunnel, where Waterloo Rd Flyover only connects with the Tunnel Area, and Lion Rock Tunnel Rd has the Tunnel Area at the Toll Plaza, not Hung Mui Kuk Rd interchange.

On the contrary, you can see how Shun Long Rd was repeatedly changed to `=motorway` despite not being Expressway or Tunnel Area. What's used here is the best solution that has been arrived at.

They are 2 separate arguments. The Sha Lek Hwy example is about a `=motorway` not needing a `ref=` . `=motorway` is different from `=trunk` .
This is based on connecting to a `=motorway` only. See Shun Long Rd, Tsing Yi N Coastal Rd.

Already added `motorway=no` + `noref=yes`

Again, you misunderstood this. `=motorway` is not about `=trunk` . It doesn't need a `ref=` . Cf Sha Lek Hwy. These roads only connects with the `=motorway` . They face the same restriction.

Please don't edit OSM for short-term events. This is not how it's used.

Sure, this can certainly be discussed. Decked nullahs are not exactly `tunnel=culvert` in the sense of being built to an integrated structure. But in any case, they are different from the one here, which is clearly a short bridge-like structure.

2. Please don't delete then re-draw the same features. Edit them.

Please don't blindly merge different sections. They are split for different reasons.

Can you please explain why you mass deleted here?

There's no raised separation here for separate lines to be drawn. `change:lanes=` and `type=connectivity` has already been added.

Please understand that separate lines should only be drawn when there's physical separation. `change:lanes=` has already been used here.