Please don't remove road lanes and crosswalk info.

The only exception may be Broadwood Rd -- Link Rd, but it's still dwarfed by Stubbs Rd and Tai Hang Rd, as well as Morrison Hill Rd.

5. I accept DVRC westbound west of Pedder St as being the same as eastbound when considering the entire roadway, which is mostly undivided. However QUeensway obviously has a main route into QRC.

Gloucester Rd here is obviously more important than the rest.

The northern half of Arsenal St isn't as important,

Hysan Ave -- Hoi Ping Rd for Caroline Hill Rd shouldn't be considered as the same as the latter.

Please explain why `bus=private` is wrong.

Doubt roads south of Leighton Rd are as important as Percival St, Marsh Rd -- Tin Lok Ln -- Canal Morrison Hill Rd, Canal Rd, Stubbs Rd, Tai Hang Rd. They are mainly for Happy Valley, Caroline Hill, and Leighton Hill only. Thse are still local through traffic.

The problem is the intersection opening is quite long, effectively creating an geometrically offset intersection between Tong Hang Rd and osm.org/way/886107366/ that is restricted crossing (only left turn into the latter is allowed)
However, as a rule, divided roads won't be joined up at an intersection.
Let me see what I can do.

To be more accurate, the western and eastern ends are physically divided. The central section is opened up.

This is half correct, half wrong. The western section is physically divided.

Happy ~9.5 year old birthday

You are the 1st!

Oh god this is going to be the most changeset comment ever

Thanks and congratulations on changeset #99999999

Please don't add descriptor labels to names.

Please don't upload for-fun edits. This is vandalism.

@rayleigh1 Thanks for trying to fix it, but the info needs to be retagged, rather than only removed. I have no idea if the climate is sufficient to determine, with only `=evergreen` and `=broadleaved`. Would you mind if I re-instate them as `tree=palm` (there are still ~30k archaic `type=palm` instances) and `taxon=Arecaceae` or equivalent? (also not sure if fixing certain edits constituents mechanical editing)

When it comes to "don't add individual trees like this", this may be acceptable up front if it is a plantation or tree nursery with permanent physical and marked growing spots.

`species=` is not strictly appropriate. There's a `tree=palm` for general use (previously `type=palm` had been used without regards), following `trees=` suggested in `landuse=orchard`. Technically, if `family=Arecaceae ` looks too ambiguous and weak, `taxon=Arecaceae` (and possibly `taxon:family=Arecaceae `) could be used.