LordGarySugar's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
161162793 | 7 months ago | Thanks for fixing, I promise I did make a note to come back and fix it myself! |
158789142 | 9 months ago | Please explain why you have changed this Cinema into a Toilets, as well as responding to the questions on your other changesets. Currently I am prepared to revert all your changes as you have not explained why you have deleted parts of highway, among other changes |
158760874 | 9 months ago | Hi, could you explain why you have deleted sections of highway and changed oneway status for a large distance?
|
158712572 | 9 months ago | Funny |
158708863 | 9 months ago | Hi, please take 10 seconds to add a quick description to each of your changesets, for example 'added path', it makes it a lot easier for people to see you're being helpful and making good changes |
158477550 | 10 months ago | I'm glad I could help! I only intended to fix a couple of wonky roads, but I got distracted! I basically ended up downloading the whole of the town to sort all the landuse out. If it helps, I actually deleted the multipolygon and retagged the outer way as residential, which made it a lot more manageable to split into smaller chunks. (But yes, still a good few hours). A lot of the landuse is still very big and overlapping with smaller areas so I might come back to it at some point. Funnily enough, I did notice that you had edited a lot of things in Kettering and did wonder if you had noticed the landuse situation and whether you would care if it got split up & detailed! While I'm here, I did remove a couple of give way signs in front of roundabouts; they are not necessary there. That's the only little nitpick I could find :) I didn't look that closely the other day, but I have to say I am a big fan of how neat and detailed all your buildings are! If you need any help with anything else, just let me know!
|
149756745 | 12 months ago | It is private, but is not tagged as such as I have never seen access tagging on leisure=track before |
149870461 | over 1 year ago | *aligning roads |
149592858 | over 1 year ago | Reverted 149588696 excluding intended additions of gardens and geometry changes |
149290862 | over 1 year ago | Hi, it looks like the British Geological Survey data is copyrighted, and cannot be used without permission. While you can use the data to find locations where there is a quarry and add it from aerial imagery, you cannot copy names from the map. |
149291509 | over 1 year ago | Did you use Google Streetview? |
147757139 | over 1 year ago | Still capacity=1? |
146862073 | over 1 year ago | Hi, thanks for updating this shop. The best way to mark this as an empty shop would be to select the 'Vacant shop' preset. Then, you could leave the name field blank and also delete brand:wikipedia field as it still refers to the closed shop. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
|
145671902 | over 1 year ago | Wouldn't it be better to mark this as proposed:landuse=commercial and proposed:tourism=theme_park as no plans have been submitted and this area is still farmland/natural? |
146499282 | over 1 year ago | +source is also survey and local knowledge |
143379878 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, I have reverted this changeset as you have marked a boundary as highway=motorway and added an impossibly shaped path. If you need help editing, the iD editor contains a help section and a tutorial. |
123654826 | about 3 years ago | Sorry if my comment was not clear, but did actually remove amenity=bus_station from the new station as well as the old one. Regardless, it's not the end of the world. As for updating the bus routes, this will take a while, as many of the bus routes in Stevenage are out of date and some are missing. I did update route 1 and 6 a couple of months ago, but this is a time consuming process, so if the councils or bus operators collaborate to identify errors, that would be great! |
123654826 | about 3 years ago | Hi, thank you for adding these recent developments to OpenStreetMap.
|
123857557 | about 3 years ago | FYI you have added junction=roundabout to hundreds of buildings, shops, footways and relations! |
118232883 | over 3 years ago | Public rights of ways have a specific tag 'prow_ref' and designation=* for a reason, to be able to differentiate public footpaths from pavements and other general footpaths. These can then be easily extracted into useful data by excluding highway=footway without these tags, for example in this overpass turbo query (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gSJ) which only shows highway=footway with a prow_ref tag. All you would need to do to clear up these 'errors' would be to simply add designation=public_footpath and prow_ref=* and leave everything else untouched. Also, deleting things because you in particular don't see a case for it is uncalled for and extremely selfish. If you ever need advice on how to solve a problem you have with using OSM data, feel free to ask, as arguments like these could have been easily avoided if you simply asked for advice before going around changing thousands of footways. |