Opmerkingen van LordGarySugar
Wijzigingenset | Wanneer | Reactie |
---|---|---|
170045077 | 2 dagen geleden | Hi, why have you used addr:housename instead of name for the name of this community centre? And what is the meaning of addr:street=Unnamed Road... this is not correct tagging... |
165507044 | 3 dagen geleden | Why have you added hedges overlapping existing landuse=meadow boundaries and not followed the boundaries of ways that have already been drawn???? |
169341196 | 3 dagen geleden | Reverted in osm.org/changeset/170221005 - you added a duplicate tourism=museum and related address tags when there is already a way for Tacla Taid museum here |
169461395 | 4 dagen geleden | Hi, I partially reverted this change so that the node could instead be tagged as disused:amenity=cafe, preserving the address info in this location |
170115745 | 4 dagen geleden | Hey, please try to use Q when adding buildings to square the corners :) Thanks for your contributions so far! |
168750324 | 4 dagen geleden | Thanks :) |
135889309 | 4 dagen geleden | This looks absolutely amazing :) |
169641410 | 10 dagen geleden | Hi, I have some concerns about the tagging in this changeset, why is every building tagged building=house when osm.org/way/1418184679 is clearly apartments, osm.org/way/1418184682 is a garage(s) and osm.org/way/1418184839 is an industrial building of sorts? Plus all the unsplit terraces that are also tagged as building=house and places where tunnel=building_passage hasn't been added appropriately like here osm.org/way/1418184877 |
168464029 | 12 dagen geleden | Changeset reverted in osm.org/changeset/169794652 - you removed the pit lane from the circuit relation without explanation |
168750324 | ongeveer 1 maand geleden | highway=road is not the correct value for the footbridge, it should be highway=footway. From aerial imagery it looks like there are steps so you should split the way twice and change the start and and to highway=steps. Also I noticed you added barrier=gate at the top of Dadford road, is this really here or should it have been added near the road on a newly drawn highway=track? |
168329674 | ongeveer 1 maand geleden | There was one validator error around the Silent Valley Reservoir (the South Dam), and another at Spelga Dam. I think it was with ways set as inner members despite sharing nodes with the outer way or the MP. (Hence why I've drawn the outer way around the Reservoir now) |
167322549 | ongeveer 1 maand geleden | Maybe put up some cones or a barrier instead of adding nonsense tags like natural=crevasse? |
158813213 | ongeveer 2 maanden geleden | I changed name=The Vicarage to addr:housename=The Vicarage, now it renders correctly with the housename and housenumber both showing |
160595865 | ongeveer 2 maanden geleden | Just a note - if a long footpath has multiple surfaces you should split the way, I corrected a footpath here that was tagged with surface=asphalt when in fact the entire length from Pie Gardens to Delmer End Lane was mostly dirt and grass. |
167070070 | 2 maanden geleden | Hi, just to let you know that one of your edits broke the greenland ice sheet multipolygon because it was missing members to complete the outer loop and had 'inner' members outside the multipolygon that hadn't been removed, corrected in osm.org/changeset/167366231 |
162389292 | 2 maanden geleden | Removed, fictional mapping osm.org/changeset/167461081 |
167072193 | 2 maanden geleden | Hi, why are you adding ways with no tags? They should be marked as buildings... |
166962203 | 2 maanden geleden | Why didn't you mention that in the changeset comment then? I wouldn't have reverted the whole changeset if you had explained why you had done that |
166962535 | 2 maanden geleden | Ok, I understand that, but I suggest that you make a proposal or post on the OSM forums explaining why all the refs should be changed, as there may be users and data consumers that are used to and rely on the existing refs for their workflow or software. Relations like (osm.org/relation/102788) have used ref=Piccadilly since 2009, so I don't think it's appropriate to change it without first discussing with the wider community. If you wanted to add these 3 letter codes as official_ref instead, that shouldn't cause any problems for anyone. Thanks. |
166962933 | 2 maanden geleden | I have kept your change of operator to GTS Rail Operations, while also updating operator:wikidata and operator:wikipedia (osm.org/changeset/167034227) |