MacLondon's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
95118743 | over 4 years ago | Was referring above to osm.org/way/879958745/ |
95118743 | over 4 years ago | Hi, it looks like there's a typo for fence_type here. I'm not sure if you'd intended to just use 'metal' or maybe a longer word. |
104214498 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for pointing out the error. Now rectified. |
103202917 | over 4 years ago | Hi. Are you sure this section of the road is actually oneway? Just seems like you might have jumped to conclusions, as the major flow of traffic would be eastbound due to the the exit only at the end of the road. |
103302229 | over 4 years ago | I was tempted to apply highway=residential to the newly open roads but held off as I saw no evidence of residents' cars here yet. My mapping of osm.org/way/933104868 (a fence) was very approximate + incomplete so it could do with improving. I suspect it continues as far as osm.org/node/7952848711 but I didn't survey that corner to confirm my suspicion. Nearby and according to https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cycles/find-a-docking-station, the Santander Cycles docking station for Copper Box Arena is listed to get reinstalled this month... but I wouldn't rely on this actually happening as planned. |
18793403 | over 4 years ago | Hi, This section is definitely two-way. I just should have spotted + removed this access tag when I split Ashe St into separate one-way + two-way sections. The original access tag had been added in osm.org/changeset/17492047 before the road was split. |
97325736 | over 4 years ago | Hi. Are you sure that "cycleway:both=track" is correct for Balliol Road + Kelfield Gardens? It looks suspiciously like "cycleway:both=no" might have been intended here. |
99793617 | over 4 years ago | Hi. This changeset changed an accurately mapped short section of single carriageway into a 'physically separated dual carriageway' as a supposedly "necessary" change. In addition this messed up several bus route relations. |
98042200 | over 4 years ago | Hi. I've adjusted the tagging here to "maxweight:imperial=5 ton" which might reduce confusion between ton/tonne. |
97854227 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Adding role=route to any members of a PTv2 bus route (i.e. route tagged with public_transport:version=2) is not permitted. All ways in the route relation should have an empty role. See osm.wiki/Buses#Adding_streets_to_the_relation |
94568543 | over 4 years ago | Hi. Names seem to have been added in osm.org/changeset/34080984. My edit was purely to make the relations more valid as PTv2 route. I wouldn't have any knowledge of the bus stop names. |
95367155 | over 4 years ago | Hi Andy,
I can't comment on the primary road status here, but on zooming out I can see that the surrounding area looks very suspect with regard to highway=primary. I could easily revert my changeset if that would be appropriate. Regards,
|
93153685 | almost 5 years ago | It seems that OSM Inspector's various different tests are carried out at different times, e.g. PTv2 tests at about 11pm, Routing tests (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.66788&lat=51.94329&zoom=8&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1) at about 6pm. It seems to me that the various tests might get updated on the page at different times of the day too. Where OSM Inspector mentions the time of the update that is the time in Germany. Until the past month the PTv2 results were updated at midnight almost on the dot, but have been anywhere between 12am-1am recently (including before the clocks changed.) The update for the Routing test seems to update at a later time during the night despite being tested hours earlier. For stops, tag is "public_transport=stop_position" with role=stop. Stops/platforms should be the top of the relation before the ways/roads. If both stop+platform are used for an individual stop, the order is stop1-platform1-stop2-platform2... (i.e.stop before platform). role=station isn't valid in PTv2. A station should have an empty role, but ideally a stop and/or platform should be used instead. Also, light_rail routes (e.g. at Stansted Airport) are flagged as invalid just because light_rail wasn't mentioned in the PTv2 proposal! |
93153685 | almost 5 years ago | Hi. My changeset actually corrected the bus routes. It was the most recent changeset for osm.org/way/145395450 that removed this (or possibly another nearby) way from all the bus routes that were affected. I merely fixed the gap after seeing the issue on OSM Inspector, but the PTv2 validator only refreshes once daily at around midnight-1am in UK. Tonight's results show these routes as valid; I have had a go at correcting the invalid London-Norwich trains which I expect will now be valid after tonight's update to the validator. BTW I don't use any plug-in for reordering routes. |
87760628 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, there's something wrong with this conditional turn restriction. From Peter St to City Sq would be a LEFT turn, but the restriction type is set as an 'only_right_turn'. |
91813206 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, osm.org/way/778812607 is clearly incorrectly drawn as a service road by the AI and needs reviewing. |
72473787 | almost 5 years ago | That node is a stop_position (railway=stop). It is not a station node (railway=station) and there should also be a station node. |
91390993 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, I checked around this area again yesterday and did some more rough edits based on photos I'd taken, including a photo I took over the fence at the recent road closure by holding my phone high in the air. I'm fairly confident that the asphalt sidewalk to the west of the paved sidewalk (osm.org/way/829265241) is just temporary as the road from Monier Bridge would curve in the opposite direction to the current bend. This bend never made sense to me prior to it being opened for the current alignment. The building(s) north of osm.org/way/826630433 now seems finished. I was able to walk around most of it's perimeter. Will update the map here when I find the time. Regards,
|
90160233 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Andy,
My changes were simply to put the roads in the correct order as should be the case with PTv2 relations. Feel free to remove the bus stops if you're confident that they aren't being used e.g. by some route variant. Regards,
|
89025837 | about 5 years ago | Hi, I checked out most of the Warner Place Liveable Neighbourhood today... and unfortunately none of the roads I checked have gone oneway yet + no modal filter either. I've retagged these upcoming changes with "proposed:" prefixes for now. I didn't check the west end of Gosset Street, so I left that as it is tagged, although I doubt the two-way has been removed yet there either. Shouldn't be too long till the oneway does get enacted though. Mac |