Mateusz Konieczny's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
63071623 | almost 7 years ago | Hopefully revert rate will be not higher than with other tagging for renderer. Good point about OSM website, I added "autolinking brand:wikipedia and other *:wikipedia tags on OSM website" to my (already way too long) TODO list. |
46513295 | almost 7 years ago | Can you look at osm.org/note/1545511 ? |
46507755 | almost 7 years ago | I received a private message from author that information=add was added tor technical reasons and that it can be removed. |
58854389 | almost 7 years ago | Are you sure that quotes are part of the name of this travel agency? |
31750515 | almost 7 years ago | I know that it is an old edit - but please, do NOT add anything based on Google maps. |
62864935 | almost 7 years ago | I am curious - what is the point of tagging pluscode? It is just a different format of specifying longitude and latitude. And as such always can be computed from location, or turned into more readable location format. |
62924861 | almost 7 years ago | Is it intentional that shop=vacant was kept for osm.org/node/3927503222#map=19/51.08827/6.59332&layers=N ? |
62741020 | almost 7 years ago | What was the reason for moving tags from relation to ways? |
58824054 | almost 7 years ago | Can you look at osm.org/note/1535685 ? |
62721042 | almost 7 years ago | According to google translate it is only describing brand:wikidata tag, not proposing any specific import. From what I see at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2017-July/thread.html#85125 this message had no followup discussion. |
62721042 | almost 7 years ago | "Can you point me to this discussion?" is necessary only if you want me to revert this edit. If you prefer to revert this edit on your own then it is not necessary. |
62721042 | almost 7 years ago | Sorry! Can you point me to this discussion? I tried contacting original author in osm.org/changeset/58260742 and there was no reply. Changeset also contained no link to mechanical edit documentation or link to a discussion, so I thought that it is an undiscussed mechanical edit. In this case - feel free to revert this edit (preferably with link to discussion edit description to avoid this confusion in a future). As this is a fresh edit, it should be fairly easy to revert it. |
61401087 | almost 7 years ago | It is nice to hear that cleanup is planned. Can you link to documentation of this import? |
53689019 | almost 7 years ago | What is the source of this edit? What is the source of data for this 1693 peaks? Is it OK to add it into OSM? |
44625597 | almost 7 years ago | @Torbat_streets What is the meaning of "surface=asphalt no 1"? |
11202041 | almost 7 years ago | Jakie jest znaczenie tagu _SITE_CODE_ ? |
61401087 | almost 7 years ago | Is this mechanical edit following osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
If not - are you planning to fix it (and revert it, if not accepted by OSM comminity)? |
54806298 | almost 7 years ago | I changed seasonal=spring-autumn to seasonal=spring;summer;autumn at osm.org/node/5292858128/history and osm.org/node/2489190758/history (objects edited in this changeset) Can you link objects where I "changed the keys from spring and summer to spring, summer and autumn" |
54806298 | almost 7 years ago | I will look at it, it was not supposed to happen. I am really sorry. |
21154024 | almost 7 years ago | Zerkniesz na osm.org/note/1531410#map=19/49.56810/22.40084&layers=N ? |