ref.: people should probably discuss Liberland issue on talk page of osm.wiki/WikiProject_Liberland and update it based on consensus, so it can be easily linked on further edits

v. osm.org/changeset/128269542 na oba TK25 i HOK koliko vidim piše "Prpić-polje" a ne "Pripić polje" ? Koji je izvor za "Pripić", ili je to typo?

Reverting due to: not responding on discussion, obvious misspelling of "aerodrom", removal of wikidata.

osm.org/changeset/143518907

this was changed by consesus (and already fixed here), but for reference: osm.wiki/Croatia/Ceste#Neasfaltirane_razvrstane_ceste

(ispravka: u prvoj točki je trebalo biti osm.org/way/505779203 i osm.org/way/1217381936)

Pitanje: Je li "W&Trail run Požega" službena ruta (označena tablama / znakovima na terenu i sl) ili samo neka ruta od nekog događanja?

Pozdrav i dobrodošao!

Vidim da si dodao trail run Požega!

Par komentara:
- Prilikom dodavanja novih puteva (npr. iz .gpx datoteka) treba paziti da se iskoriste postojeći, a ne da se novi samo dodaju preko njih. Vidi problem npr. sa osm.org/way/1217381936 i osm.org/way/1217381936/history
- "name=*" tag na putevima (ways) služi za dodavanje službenih imena ulica i dr. Za dodavanje službenih (označenih) ruta koristimo poseban tip objekta naziva "relacija" u koji se dodaju postojeći putevi, v. osm.wiki/Relation:route
- Šumske/poljske puteve/staze obično označavamo kao highway=path a ne highway=footway (koji su više za uređene npr. popločane ili asfaltirane pješačke staze)

Možeš li to sam popraviti ili trebaš pomoć?

Ukoliko budeš imao bilo kakvih pitanja, slobodno pitaj na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/hr/72

LP,
Matija
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142931500

Hi and welcome! I see you changed wikidata to Q3511918 (from Q101859423, which you stripped of all data). Can you explain the purpose, i.e. why was such change made? Where the two wikidata items perhaps aliases (should one redirect to another)? Or something else?

building=* is only about architectural type of the building, not about its use (i.e. you could have building=observatory being used as amenity=pub). man_made=observatory (which you deleted) is its actual use.

So, can you please revert all of those "Why two tags where one may carry the info" changesets of yours?

building=* is only about architectural type of the building, not about its use (i.e. you could have building=observatory being used as amenity=pub). man_made=observatory (which you deleted) is its actual use.

So, can you please revert all of those "Why two tags where one may carry the info" changesets of yours?

also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-bulk-removal-of-service-driveway2

I've seen it at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-tagging-glass-recycling/101011 but that discussion is indeed less than 24h old

ref: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/5116

No, it was 2-3 images at most. I use the commons app in the field to take a picture, and add wikimedia_commons link to it directly (via EveryDoor or OsmAnd), so waiting until I get to the computer is not really an option (well I could be just leaving notes with pictures via SC I guess, but then it is too much work back home to solve all of them). If you can reliably reproduce the upload bug, it would be great to add info to that issue tracker!

Yes, I'm hitting the bug in android Commons app with uploads (https://github.com/commons-app/apps-android-commons/issues/5231). I've re-uploaded it manually now...

yes, thanks for spotting! Reverted now in osm.org/changeset/136808729

it seems there is as of 2023-04-26 construction area: osm.org/note/3451060

Could you visit that forum thread please @ti-lo and make your case there? I'm looking at taginfo, it says there are tens of thousands of such keys, which seems quite significant to me. Neither are all uses of OSM data purely mechanical (i.e. open OsmAnd and click on details on shops having service:vehicle: tags). Nor are all vehicles cars (e.g. see "Marine" in this shop name). Also see osm.wiki/Key:service:vehicle: - just because tags become popular through ATYL policy does not mean people can go and start removing them without discussion. And fact that discussion didn't happen half a decade ago does not mean the consensus was made to do X - quite the contrary. But all that should be better discussed at wider community forum then thru this rudimentary changeset discussion interface (which also happen to have much more limited audience).

I see in this and other changesets you're removing service:* tags and (only partially) replacing them car:*

could you please stop doing that until you've discussed it at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 ? Thanks

Yeah, I guessed it might be a long shot, thanks anyway :)

Wiki related to HOT I've found do not mention it; but I guess it might've been probably related to osm.wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/IDPCamps there is no confirmation yet.

Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at osm.wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?