==Copy from 94546363==
devac您好，
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了，我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况，其余我无可奉告。
并且，数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界，不加以警告或提醒，干啥啥不行，双标第一名，我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪，请见谅，我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

怎么到处都有嘉心糖（喜

😅

devac您好，
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了，我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况，其余我无可奉告。
并且，数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界，不加以警告或提醒，干啥啥不行，双标第一名，我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪，请见谅，我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

来源
https://dmfw.mca.gov.cn/online/map.html?keyWordPlaceName=&isIndex=true

Dear Woodpeck, I've made my point clear and asked you if you would change other disputed area such as Aksai Chin. You didn't give me a direct answer but I could feel your attitude from your reply. So I just did it. And I think there're still some disputed areas not being changed to meet your standard. All in all, not change them, or change them all. Thank you for your understanding.

I think the India-Pakistan cease fire line doesn't completely depart this area and it should be a disputed area.

哈哈，可惜差了一点啊😂

Congratulations from China!

😅😅😅

恭祝公路贯通

Why you named all the boundary "India"?

建议玩CSL

太猛了

(A digression: I write such sentences on my personal page just because I dealt with a lot of editing wars between Vietnam and China and a little hate it.)

The names you mentioned are turly strange and I advice delete them. I've restore some names in this changest because they are near the roads or the village where we can easily find the evidence of China actually controling.

About the twi-language name, I mean that if we can't say who actually control the land, the name should be in two language.

Last, as a Chinese, it is necessary to care about the territorial integrity of my country but it can't be the reason for me to make fake polite edits because of this, so I choose to talk with you first. Sometime I should even avoid some people destroying China actually control area. Not biased, just follow the reality.

加油

？

在？为什么封闭施工至明年3月的桥你要来标开通？

homo is coming()