您好，想请求“重庆地名库信息服务”的具体链接或服务程序，望告知，谢谢。

Thanks for your reply. I will mind it!

Hi, the changset 116323434 wrongly changed the coastline and I'd like to restore it. If I do so, it may make mistakes on futures in this changest. Please note it, thanks.

Hi jonahsullivan, you deleted the outer boundary of Yongxing Is.. It seemed that the imagery you used is out of date, and the new shape is the boundary you deleted. I will restore this changset. Thank you.

Please check:
http://www.nhjd.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=327271&extra=&ordertype=1
and
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=16.84039748212367&lng=112.33859895917703&zoom=16&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=100&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2020-10-01%7C2021-04-30&atmFilter=&showDates=false

@highflyer74, restore all of them, they're ads.

P.S.
+Q:599858 可约 = Add my QQ(a Chinese timely communication software): 599858 I'm available

So I will restore it, and by the way, please check the satellite image before you delete, thx.

Hello, in this changeset, you deleted the building of Chongqingxi(W.) railway station, and also I noticed you have deleted other buildings in other changesets. Could you please tell me why did you do so? Thanks.

😅

Sorry, there is a relation of Aksai Chin, so I mean we should add "- West Part". Thx. (〃°ω°〃)

Thanks for your reply and fixing. So this is the boundary relation of the west section, and I think if it only includes the west part, we should add "- West Part" or "to Aksai Chin" to its name after "Chinese claim". How about you? If you don't mind, I will do it myself. Thank you.

And also, I think the eastern section (South Tibet) should be included in the relation.

The Chinese claim line in Pangong Lake area is line823046242, according to the standard map of Chinese government.

Hello,
You added a village called Lower Doklam village. Could you tell me what's the source of its name?

隔壁老王头，您好：

首先感谢您改进地图。但您在变更集114499432、114500078、114500249、114501240、114502264、114502553、114505626、114506422中的更改严重破坏了班公湖片区的关系，我已将其回退，但保留了其中有意义的其他变更。

有时一个多边形过大时，我们会将其拆分为多个线段以方便编辑以及方便构成其它同时使用这些线段作为边界的关系（您可以将这一条线同时添加为两个关系的外部成员，这样就可以不用重复地绘制线段），并添加到一个表示多边形的关系中（关系中会有type=multipolygon这个键），班公湖也是如此。您也许想要将班公湖多边形关系西部的外部成员合并成为一条线，且将东西两部分分开，使用单独的一个要素表示这个巨大的湖，这导致了大量其他相关多边形关系边界出现缺口，关系不完整，地图也无法渲染，请您不要这样做（尤其是您使用iD而不是JOSM编辑时，iD无法编辑显示区域外的要素，大型关系使用iD编辑极其容易出现错误），也请您后续编辑时稍加注意，提交更改前稍加检查，谢谢！

还有114500249。

回退的变更集有114499432、114500078、114500078、114501240、114502264、114502553、114505626、114506422。以上变更集，由于用户 @隔壁老王头 将班公湖多边形关系（multipolygon relation）西部的外部（outer）成员合并成为了一条直线，切将东西两部分分开，导致了大量其他相关多边形关系边界出现缺口，故回退。

114514

😅😅😅😅😅还没有进展啊😅😅😅😅😅

Thanks for adding tag. But it may be wrong that tag Lulin Region( osm.org/relation/3964620 ) controlled by China. Actually this area is controlled by both China and Bhutan, and Bhutan controls more area of it, such as Charit. Although I'm a Chinese user, I would respect that fact. So in my opinion, it may be better to tag its controlled_by tag as BT. Could you help to correct the tag? Thank you.

Yes. Now it's sure there are 4 xiaokang villages in Lagyap, 3 of which are in disputed area. And it is the last one Chinese xiaokang village in Lagyap called Basanglong(巴桑隆).