Desu，您为什么总是强调所谓“前述证据”呢？它不是争议中任意一方的观点。您又为什么会认为不是实际控制呢？中国各种船只在此地长期坐滩不移动，并且阻止其他国家的船只接近应该是很好的证明了。另外，中国早已声明“中国对南海诸岛，包括东沙群岛、西沙群岛、中沙群岛和南沙群岛拥有主权”（见https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/nanhai/chn/snhwtlcwj/201607/t20160712_8521049.htm）

And I think, if there's no sorce showing the English name, you needn't use Internet translator to translate, which may make jokes. Especially for Tibet names, you should know the Tibet orignal name and use the translator.

Oh well, in Japanese "湾" is also "wan". You fully use the translator from Jpn. to Eng. lol

The name of node "天神湾" (#9271435181) seemed wrong. It's obversly not a Tibetan name but a Chinese orignal name. "Tenjin" is the pronunciation of "天神" in Japanese. In Chinese, it's "Tianshen". But "湾", or “Wan” is correct. I'm so interested in the translator you used. xD

完全空白地区从零开始画山路的话可以试试RapiD~

有来源吗

According to De-fcto, the area is under Chinese contro, so it's suitable to use Chinese in its name just like the names of other islets under Vietnamese or Philippine contro are in their languages.

您好，想请求“重庆地名库信息服务”的具体链接或服务程序，望告知，谢谢。

Thanks for your reply. I will mind it!

Hi, the changset 116323434 wrongly changed the coastline and I'd like to restore it. If I do so, it may make mistakes on futures in this changest. Please note it, thanks.

Hi jonahsullivan, you deleted the outer boundary of Yongxing Is.. It seemed that the imagery you used is out of date, and the new shape is the boundary you deleted. I will restore this changset. Thank you.

Please check:
http://www.nhjd.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=327271&extra=&ordertype=1
and
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=16.84039748212367&lng=112.33859895917703&zoom=16&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=100&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2020-10-01%7C2021-04-30&atmFilter=&showDates=false

@highflyer74, restore all of them, they're ads.

P.S.
+Q:599858 可约 = Add my QQ(a Chinese timely communication software): 599858 I'm available

So I will restore it, and by the way, please check the satellite image before you delete, thx.

Hello, in this changeset, you deleted the building of Chongqingxi(W.) railway station, and also I noticed you have deleted other buildings in other changesets. Could you please tell me why did you do so? Thanks.

😅

Sorry, there is a relation of Aksai Chin, so I mean we should add "- West Part". Thx. (〃°ω°〃)

Thanks for your reply and fixing. So this is the boundary relation of the west section, and I think if it only includes the west part, we should add "- West Part" or "to Aksai Chin" to its name after "Chinese claim". How about you? If you don't mind, I will do it myself. Thank you.

And also, I think the eastern section (South Tibet) should be included in the relation.

The Chinese claim line in Pangong Lake area is line823046242, according to the standard map of Chinese government.

Hello,
You added a village called Lower Doklam village. Could you tell me what's the source of its name?