OSMWeekly's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
114828918 | over 3 years ago | Rad, that's good |
114828918 | over 3 years ago | specifically this way: 1011305256 |
114828918 | over 3 years ago | for the pedestrian way, you have it tagged as highway=pedestrian (osm.wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=en) but you may want to use highway=footway (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway) there's a subtle difference which boils down to how often vehicles are able to use the way. |
114976505 | over 3 years ago | I am curious about your use of relations. Did you intend for these to both be joined by relation? |
114831400 | over 3 years ago | hello. I believe you confuse d building=retail for landuse=retail. I am changing these. |
114828918 | over 3 years ago | looks good! I don't know if you need separate 'entry' nodes for each door unless those doors go to explicitly separate parts of the building. |
114665805 | over 3 years ago | hey! remember if you use building:levels tag in a building:part tag, to also make sure the main building it's apart of has the building:levels added as well! see: "Where a building has been split into parts, the whole building way should still have the tags building:levels=* and height=*. These values should be the maximum of all the building parts. A building that has a three-story part and a six-story part is still a six-story building. " in osm.wiki/Key:building:part I fixed it up for you! |
107656044 | about 4 years ago | Sorted it out, thank you! |
105901694 | about 4 years ago | I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island. |
105901763 | about 4 years ago | I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island. |
105901819 | about 4 years ago | I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island. |
106485677 | about 4 years ago | I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island. |
106638899 | about 4 years ago | I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island. |
103492040 | about 4 years ago | Hi curious, why have you changed the tag from natural=tree to natural=wood. both are correct tags? |
87521448 | about 5 years ago | ah gotcha, thanks for the clarification! It seems mostly good. I've only found a few oddities so far, but I'll keep updating as I find them. Thanks for implementing them, it's a valuable contribution. |
87521448 | about 5 years ago | Hi Northfork, Forgive me if I've missed discussion about this elsewhere, but may I ask where the address import is coming from? thank you |
84653316 | about 5 years ago | source: Aerial Imagery. |
83063865 | over 5 years ago | hah, thanks! |
80287831 | over 5 years ago | Here's the page: |
80287831 | over 5 years ago | Hi Belobog. 146 is adding buildings to the metro area around Tulsa, OK as well as cleaning up exisitng building footprints. I admit though, often go overboard and add parking, parking aisles, and other easy to spot things as well as clear up deprecated tags when JOSM notifies me. |