Wow! thanks for the heads up! too bad it was such a messy edit, haha. Here's to 9k more!

aha, merci beaucoup. Je seulement parle un petit peu de Français et donc, quand j'ai demandé a le Bar à Thym, je n'ai comprende exactement qu'est ce qu'il me disait :') . merci a votre bienvenue. Je vais essayer plus fort.

et aussi, le carto ici est tres bien. Dans les etats-unis il y a plus beaucoup chose à faire.

a, bonne question, je fait verifier demain, merci.

Hello,

It appears you accidentally changed an entire forested area into a residential area.

Furthermore, as mentioned in a previous edit, removing paths for being on private property is not the correct use of this map.

Please see here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

lastly, descriptions are not used in the name tag. For example, here you would also use an 'access=private'.

hello,

Is there a trail there? Even if it's private, it's still "visible from the ground". trail should be marked as private with access=private tag, not removed.

hi @Naturebiz, I've updated it, fixing the name and adding the 'disused:' lifecycle prefix. if there's another business there now, would you let me know or add it? thank you!

question: should "city of _" also be struck from the administrative boundary?

Happy New Year from NY, USA!

Rad, that's good

specifically this way: 1011305256

for the pedestrian way, you have it tagged as highway=pedestrian (osm.wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=en)

but you may want to use highway=footway (osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)

there's a subtle difference which boils down to how often vehicles are able to use the way.

I am curious about your use of relations. Did you intend for these to both be joined by relation?

hello.

I believe you confuse d building=retail for landuse=retail. I am changing these.

looks good! I don't know if you need separate 'entry' nodes for each door unless those doors go to explicitly separate parts of the building.

hey! remember if you use building:levels tag in a building:part tag, to also make sure the main building it's apart of has the building:levels added as well! see: "Where a building has been split into parts, the whole building way should still have the tags building:levels=* and height=*. These values should be the maximum of all the building parts. A building that has a three-story part and a six-story part is still a six-story building. " in osm.wiki/Key:building:part

I fixed it up for you!

Sorted it out, thank you!

I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island.

I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island.

I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island.

I recently made a series of edits that were against the spirit of OSM and were plainly mean. I regret these changeset comments and vow to uphold a higher standard of respect from here on out. To any who find these comments, do not make the same mistake I did: thinking that imports are ruining all of your hard work. Sometimes, to take two steps forward, you need to take a step backwards. OSM is a collaborative project, not an island.