OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
166279777 3 months ago

Wow! thanks for the heads up! too bad it was such a messy edit, haha. Here's to 9k more!

152151400 about 1 year ago

aha, merci beaucoup. Je seulement parle un petit peu de Français et donc, quand j'ai demandé a le Bar à Thym, je n'ai comprende exactement qu'est ce qu'il me disait :') . merci a votre bienvenue. Je vais essayer plus fort.

et aussi, le carto ici est tres bien. Dans les etats-unis il y a plus beaucoup chose à faire.

152151400 about 1 year ago

a, bonne question, je fait verifier demain, merci.

145645030 over 1 year ago

Hello,

It appears you accidentally changed an entire forested area into a residential area.

Furthermore, as mentioned in a previous edit, removing paths for being on private property is not the correct use of this map.

Please see here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

lastly, descriptions are not used in the name tag. For example, here you would also use an 'access=private'.

144676173 over 1 year ago

hello,

Is there a trail there? Even if it's private, it's still "visible from the ground". trail should be marked as private with access=private tag, not removed.

76053267 almost 2 years ago

hi @Naturebiz, I've updated it, fixing the name and adding the 'disused:' lifecycle prefix. if there's another business there now, would you let me know or add it? thank you!

116266990 over 3 years ago

question: should "city of _" also be struck from the administrative boundary?

115629029 over 3 years ago

Happy New Year from NY, USA!