Hi Martials, thanks for the contributions. One small note: a traffic calming island is area in between two lanes where pedestrians can wait while crossing the road. (It's part of a pedestrian crossing.) It's not the area in the middle of a roundabout.

Hi, could you please provide a proper source for this information? So that it is possible to verify if these routes are still correct?

Hi Martials! I am removing the cycle lanes on Sorgenfriveien. We don't draw separate cycle lanes when they are part of the road surface. Instead we use the cycleway=lane tag on the road itself.

Hi Martials, I see that you removed the highway=pedestrian tag from Torget. Was that with reason or by accident?

Yeah, these are not power stations for charging your car, but regular domestic sockets in the wall, can be used for charging your phone or computer if you're low on power. Many public and semi-public indoor spaces have them, available for public use but not clearly signed. What would you suggest for a top-level tag in this case?

"... that would leave a node withOUT tags...", sorry for the confusing typo.

I'm not sure if you are familiar with the socket tags? The tag format is socket:<type> = <count>. With this format, if one is not certain about either the socket type or the number of sockets, it is not possible to add the tag. And since this is the only tag, that would leave a node with tags, which is not usable either. That is why I used the generic type value, and "yes" for count. Do you have a better solution for tagging sockets?

Exactly because there are so many socket types defined, and the tag definition is put up in such a way that you can't add a POI unless you know the exact socket type. This goes against the way OSM defines tags in general. I can not get around that without either changing the complete socket tag definition, or adding the generic "domestic" type.

Dat is een typisch voorbeeld van "Tagging for the renderer" osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Ik zie dat je een aantal voetpaden in service wegen veranderd hebt. (Zelfs in het Huis van de Vijf Zintuigen!) Als regel in OpenStreetMap geldt dat dit soort zaken ter plekker verifiseert moeten kunnen worden. Het is waar dat dit voetplein ook voor dienstvoertuigen gebruikt wordt, maar ik zie ter plekke niets wat dit een eigen dienstweg maakt...

I can understand the idea behind this, but emojis do not form a "name". Even if you could call emoji a language (which I doubt), it does not have a concept of names.

It would fit beter with it's own tag ("emoji" maybe?), and then you could go even further and also add things like 🗻 (Mount Fuji) and 🗽 (Statue of Liberty).

But personally, I think it's a bad idea.

Hi, this import overwrote both custom opening hours and website addresses

Hi, why did you remove the oneway on Prinsens gate? There is a sign on the crossing with Dronningens gate that says it's not allowed to drive further north for cars. I agree the situation is very unclear (for example, no indication of this coming from either direction of Dronningens gate), but it is how I interpreted the situation. Maybe I misunderstood?

The guy is called Olav Nygard, not Olav Nygård. :-) https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olav_Nygard

Was de surface tag op osm.org/way/444809961 niet in orde?

We worden in ieder geval bezig gehouden :) Bedankt voor al het werk!

Bedankt voor de wijziging! Sorry, ik zeur een beetje, maar als het een C12 bord is (ziet er ook zo uit op Mapillary) zou het dan niet motor_vehicle:backward=no moeten zijn? En misschien zelfs oneway=yes met bicycle:backward=yes. Sorry, ben niet bekend met de situatie, maar werd er door m'n zus op gewezen... :-)

Hei Steinar! A sidewalk ("pavement") is not a bicycle way. Just the fact that cyclists are allowed to cycle somewhere, does not make it a cycleway. You can add bicycle=yes or even bicycle=designated on sidewalks if you want, but the correct tagging for a sidewalk is highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.

Hi Magnus, thanks for all the details you have put into the map! I have a few comments for you:

- Footway=sidewalk should only be used in combination with highway=footway. It can not be used together with highway=pedestrian. I tend to use highway=pedestrian only for ways that are considerably broader than normal footpaths, for example at least 3m broad.

- When addind sidewalks, make sure you connect them to all road crossings, otherwise routing software can not let pedestrians cross the road there. For example, the sidewalk on the east side of Sverres gate is not connected to the service road on the other side, between Schønninghuset and Kalvskinnet garasje, so routing software can not let pedestrians cross the road there. I tend to draw sidewalks as separate elements only on roads that are so broad or busy that pedestrians should only cross at pedestrian crossings. For smaller roads, I just add the sidewalk=both tag.

- Adding area=yes to road outlines was a really nice idea to show the complete road surface. However, this tag should only be used on real "driveable areas", not lineair roads. The best indication for this is that the higher level roads (primary, secondary) do not support the area=yes tag. Instead, use the area:highway=* tag, which sadly has very little support. (OsmAnd supports it though.)

Yeah, now to find the names of the rest of the statues... :-)