I don't think there was anything explicitly saying the cycle access was one-directional. It just happens to be along the southern end of Hardwick Road where the best facilities are. I tend to tag with cycleway:left=share_sidewalk when there's no physical separation aside from kerb between the road and shared pavement where it runs for a long distance. If you wish to tag these as explicit separate ways then I'm fine with that, I normally just do it if there is sufficient distance apart. Most cycle routers will see cycleway:left as a hint that facilities exist, even if they don't understand the value. The share_sidewalk tag value should probably be documented, but I think it quite logical.

I've reviewed your changes and enhanced the route relation further given the crossings of Hardwick Road and Scania Way.

I didn't realise, my apologies about that. Thanks for fixing it early. Overall the change to valid speed limits was worth it for the interim period. I normally try to ensure relations remain unaffected.

See https://1drv.ms/i/s!Ah1Oa_WAIEBgxXkxjWDnjhKKNGGS (JPG, 2.5 MB)

As am I. There's an information notice displayed near to Willow House, that expired in 2007. I queried this with Norwich Council but they stated it was not a project of theirs, but that the information was still useful. Only the landowner will know for sure. I have often walked that route during my trip to work, and assumed it was an official footpath only until recently. Hence the changeset comment.

For reference, there are 62 uses of "unsuitable" versus 5 for "discouraged" via TagInfo. Also, discouraged is a different meaning to unsuitable. If one owns a particularly slim motor vehicle then the gap could be made comfortably, so the judgement is per case not a general discouragement for all. Of interest, the Google StreetView car appears to have gone through successfully.

The sign says "unsuitable" explicitly. No would imply no access at all. Discouraged is perhaps an acceptable synonym, but again the sign says unsuitable, and the access is, well, unsuitable. So perhaps the 'standard' access values are outdated?

I would recommend checking with the current NaPTAN data first, but I don't mind.

The former is the stop code area reference, see osm.org/relation/4264945/history

The latter two look to be a zero-based suffix to describe the individual stop points.

Those tags are from around two years ago so the NaPTAN DB may have changed since.

If Wendene is a secondary road from the A1074 then what's its B-Road ref?

It was a gate similar to that shown at http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-ramblers-gate-on-a-public-footpath-by-the-river-bure-at-little-hautbois-59542871.html

Which is where I likely got the name from, not spotting a suitable match on the OSM wiki barrier page. The phrase "squeeze gate" comes to mind, only a few examples at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/barrier#values

I've added The Royal Horseshoes, that appears to still be active. The Marquis of Granby nearby permanently closed according to WhatPub.com.

I think I recall there being one at the junction but was distracted by driving and an incident with an old lady and postman at the time arguing.

Yes, agreed - actioned in changeset 36206221.

Yes, an automated edit, but I was the user that set 99.5% of those tags originally. I left the source:ref tag as is, since the refs are unchanged. I messaged you about the U-refs, allowed a week for response, then matched them to the rest. It does state in the wiki that non-signed refs shouldn't use the ref key.

Conversely it also leads to the Centrum building. I think it best to only have officially signed names for foot paths, such as those in Bowthorpe, e.g. "Red Ant Way".

Does this path really stop short of connecting to the footway north of it? Is its name really "Walk to Genome Centre" or is that just a direction sign?

It would also be great if the local cycle network with HTML colour tag could be rendered in the Cycle Map render :)

They are more of a name than ref, agreed. I changed it since routing agents (e.g. OsmAnd) were saying "turn right on to Orange", which made no sense when spoken. The colours are already stored against the route relations. I shall probably remove the ref altogether and put the pedalway names into the name tag, the existing origin/destination into a note tag.

I suspect that was an editing mistake, since it is Royal Terrace from Royal Parade North to the top, with addressing suggesting that to the right of that it is Royal Plain.