Suaicheantas OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Àm Beachd
170664935 o chionn 15 làithean

The Mapnik icon does look more Britishly appropriate, now that I've seen it.

170664935 o chionn 15 làithean

They do sound very similar, even Wikipedia defines: “A beer garden (German: Biergarten) is an outdoor area in which beer and food are served, typically at shared tables shaded by trees.” Do the bar staff have to wear Austrian dresswear? Do the tables have to be a certain length? Must the trees be of a certain species?

167460562 o chionn 15 làithean

These roads were mapped in 2020 as service driveway kind. Why did you change them to residential, for what is a cemetery surfaced access route?

119213269 o chionn timcheall air mìos

The raised crossing and cyclists is something I have no problem with, as that is part of the roadway. It’s the narrow riser footpaths either side of Old Watton Road that shouldn’t be used, as they aren’t listed as cycle links. The city cycle streets map isn’t zoomed in enough to show such detail, but it would be sensible to route cyclists through the main road junction for increased visibility and reduced pedestrian contention.

119213269 o chionn timcheall air mìos

Also this particular one is narrow, pedestrian width and inappropriate for shared use, opening out at 90 degree directly on to 20 mph traffic crossing unseen from the left having descended an incline.

119213269 o chionn timcheall air mìos

Paved footpaths are by default not for cyclists. The one in question is not owned or maintained by the county council, per their GIS.

119213269 o chionn timcheall air mìos

bicycle=dismount is acceptable, but it is clearly a privately owned footpath on the Spire grounds. They probably don’t mind and I don’t doubt cyclists have used it (such as the one with life-threatening injuries after collision with bus/Mini yesterday).

119213269 o chionn timcheall air mìos

Why did you mark the footpath from the shared pavement of Tollgate Way to Old Watton Road as permitted for bicycles? The flush tactile paving and island and lack of paint/signs indicates this is a footpath only.

169194051 o chionn timcheall air mìos

How come public right of way has been blocked off? Or is there just an unlocked gate that you are meant to open? Really access=no?

164345097 o chionn 2 mhìos

Why add ' Village Sign' suffix to man_made village_sign name nodes? It’s not verifiable on ground.

144404863 o chionn 3 mìosan

Have supercharged my S there for free a couple of times. The view from within the showroom outwards past the glass frontage is worth a look too.

166841417 o chionn 3 mìosan

Oh, seems it is another of those Americanisms that have made it into OSM tagging convention. However, can see why I queried since only one letter transition away from what they are commonly referred to here. Thanks for the background info.

166841417 o chionn 3 mìosan

Also sure this reads number plates and isn’t just a basic traffic counter?

166841417 o chionn 3 mìosan

Typo ALNR?

161999165 o chionn 4 mìosan

Norfolk County Council often have phrase-like names for obscure things such as short footpath links that I tag using official_name key. However, those are from official source, so description/note probably best from OSM mapper point of view.

161999165 o chionn 4 mìosan

Perhaps replace name=[value] with description=value then.

161999165 o chionn 4 mìosan

Why the square brackets in name tag value?

163282201 o chionn 6 mìosan

The Aldeby village sign doesn’t have the text ‘Village Sign’ on it, so why did you change the name tag to that?

161293672 o chionn 8 mìosan

Great stuff.

161310821 o chionn 8 mìosan

Probably surface=bitmac if that is a footpath, a more specific type of asphalt.