Pink Duck's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
170664935 | 14 days ago | The Mapnik icon does look more Britishly appropriate, now that I've seen it. |
170664935 | 14 days ago | They do sound very similar, even Wikipedia defines: “A beer garden (German: Biergarten) is an outdoor area in which beer and food are served, typically at shared tables shaded by trees.” Do the bar staff have to wear Austrian dresswear? Do the tables have to be a certain length? Must the trees be of a certain species? |
167460562 | 14 days ago | These roads were mapped in 2020 as service driveway kind. Why did you change them to residential, for what is a cemetery surfaced access route? |
119213269 | about 1 month ago | The raised crossing and cyclists is something I have no problem with, as that is part of the roadway. It’s the narrow riser footpaths either side of Old Watton Road that shouldn’t be used, as they aren’t listed as cycle links. The city cycle streets map isn’t zoomed in enough to show such detail, but it would be sensible to route cyclists through the main road junction for increased visibility and reduced pedestrian contention. |
119213269 | about 1 month ago | Also this particular one is narrow, pedestrian width and inappropriate for shared use, opening out at 90 degree directly on to 20 mph traffic crossing unseen from the left having descended an incline. |
119213269 | about 1 month ago | Paved footpaths are by default not for cyclists. The one in question is not owned or maintained by the county council, per their GIS. |
119213269 | about 1 month ago | bicycle=dismount is acceptable, but it is clearly a privately owned footpath on the Spire grounds. They probably don’t mind and I don’t doubt cyclists have used it (such as the one with life-threatening injuries after collision with bus/Mini yesterday). |
119213269 | about 1 month ago | Why did you mark the footpath from the shared pavement of Tollgate Way to Old Watton Road as permitted for bicycles? The flush tactile paving and island and lack of paint/signs indicates this is a footpath only. |
169194051 | about 1 month ago | How come public right of way has been blocked off? Or is there just an unlocked gate that you are meant to open? Really access=no? |
164345097 | 2 months ago | Why add ' Village Sign' suffix to man_made village_sign name nodes? It’s not verifiable on ground. |
144404863 | 3 months ago | Have supercharged my S there for free a couple of times. The view from within the showroom outwards past the glass frontage is worth a look too. |
166841417 | 3 months ago | Oh, seems it is another of those Americanisms that have made it into OSM tagging convention. However, can see why I queried since only one letter transition away from what they are commonly referred to here. Thanks for the background info. |
166841417 | 3 months ago | Also sure this reads number plates and isn’t just a basic traffic counter? |
166841417 | 3 months ago | Typo ALNR? |
161999165 | 4 months ago | Norfolk County Council often have phrase-like names for obscure things such as short footpath links that I tag using official_name key. However, those are from official source, so description/note probably best from OSM mapper point of view. |
161999165 | 4 months ago | Perhaps replace name=[value] with description=value then. |
161999165 | 4 months ago | Why the square brackets in name tag value? |
163282201 | 6 months ago | The Aldeby village sign doesn’t have the text ‘Village Sign’ on it, so why did you change the name tag to that? |
161293672 | 8 months ago | Great stuff. |
161310821 | 8 months ago | Probably surface=bitmac if that is a footpath, a more specific type of asphalt. |