Kruhák vrácen z deklu od kanálu (?!?) zpátky na kruhák: osm.org/changeset/129609939

Líbit se mi tam nemusí, ale mapujme svět, jak opravdu vypadá, ne jaký bychom ho chtěli.

Díky.

Vot technika! Tak to je mazec, to by mě nenapadlo, že tohle budou osvětlovat:) Díky za doplnění.

Ahoj, tahle pěšina je osvětlená nějak na časovač, nebo na detekci? Totiž když jsem tam šel minule, byla tam tma jak v pytli, ani jsem žádný světla neviděl, ani zhaslý...nepřipadlo mi, že by to z ulice nebo z parku bylo osvětlené dost na lit=yes...

It is better, thank you. I have removed the extra tags: what's in "access" is valid for everyone, so it's not necessary to add extra tags, if the permissions are the same. See e.g. the current version of osm.org/way/49493386

"you can go there with car or bike, if you have things to do there" would be "vehicle=destination" btw

Was there a change in signage? Last I checked, there was "no vehicles at all, except those with explicit permission", which was okay with the previous tagging access=private, foot=yes (or just motor_vehicle=private would have been fine).

access=permissive is "anyone can go here, but owner might close access", motor_vehicle=yes is "open for any motor vehicle, no conditions", and "horse=no" is "horses explicitly forbidden". This seems to be tagged completely at random now.

Hm, koukám jsem si nezavřel předchozím changeset v Běchovicích :(
Ten se původně jmenoval "Běchovice - cesty, pěšiny"

Please do not delete buildings that were mapped correctly: the single node that you added instead was not an adequate replacement. Reverted in osm.org/changeset/129316513

průjezd z Ronkovy na jih opět zahrazen Zákazem vjezdu motorových vozidel, na sever průjezdné.

Ta vlečka je hodně bývalá...má smysl ji znovu mapovat (a to konkrétně tenhle kousek, i bez pokračování do dvacet+ let neexistujícího ČKD), i když po ní už vůbec nic nezbylo? (V historii to kdysi zmapovaný bylo, tuším že tady, ale už tehdy to byl jen pozůstatek vlečky, provoz skončil cca 1998: osm.org/changeset/11258851 )

Thanks. I added oneway=no for explicitness.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/128882957 : original tagging was scarce but correct, this is a department located in a different building from the central office.

Main building: osm.org/way/34113022

Planning department:
osm.org/node/367763896

Hello, that was incorrect and broke routing in central Prague: The road has been two-way for half a year now.

Reverted the remaining part of your edit in osm.org/changeset/128878619

No worries, everyone makes mistakes :) A few mistakes in many good edits is quite human.

Fixed: this is legal to enter e.g. from Řevnická from the north: osm.org/way/408072520 . Please only tag bicycle=no where necessary, most of the time this is implied in highway classification (access=no, motor_vehicle=yes where motorway=yes is tagged) osm.wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

Mapping adjacent roads as also bicycle=no creates gaps in roads that are in reality allowed.

Not correct: left turn from Sárská south to Řevnická fully legal here, as mapped in the cycling route X135 osm.org/relation/1757955 .

Please do not add restrictions that do not actually exist. (Note also that the straight continuation is marked motorroad=yes, which in itself means bicycle=no osm.org/way/134508658 ) . Reverted in osm.org/changeset/128596912

The footway over Karlsbrücke is not a missing path, it doesn't actually exist - it's not visible within the wider pedestrian area or in Mostecká. Also, it goes over a bridge most of the way, not just that little bit over Čertovka. Also, Esri imagery is outdated for the river outlines that you have edited here.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/128480785

fix sidewalk=none na sidewalk=no měl původně být jen na Libeň, Žižkov jsem opravil mimoděk

(Nahoře od zast.Prosecká po terminál Letňany bez drátů, tam není zatím ani příprava - sloupy)