OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from BushmanK on 18 November 2016 at 21:33

Just in case: Forum discussion Changeset discussion So, that has been done with good intentions, but not really in accordance with OSM rules and guidelines. Therefore, data quality (which is the top priority in OSM, not the amount of data) could easily be compromised.

Comment from SomeoneElse on 18 November 2016 at 21:50

It’s also worth mentioning that I’m also seeing wikidata edits locally (to be clear, not from either of the users mentioned above) that seem to be linking “not quite the same thing” in OSM and wikidata, so care is still needed. As I said on the forum link posted above it’s “something that as a community we’d need to discuss”, and that doesn’t appear to be happenong, smiley face or no smiley face.

Comment from BushmanK on 18 November 2016 at 22:14

I’d add that in Europe or another place with a high density of active mappers, a negative effect of similar behavior is usually reduced by a community due to constant checking and fixing. While in Africa, harm is way more significant, because it will way less unlikely fixed if needed. So, instead of praising this kind of activity, I’d say: “oh, well, now we have the whole bunch of potentially wrong data in Africa, where it will stay forever without being carefully checked”.

Log in to leave a comment