Logo OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Ikona e-mailu Ikona Bluesky Ikona Facebooku Ikona LinkedIn Ikona Mastodonu Ikona Telegramu Ikona X

Diskuse

Komentář od BushmanK z 18. 11. 2016 v 21:33

Just in case: Forum discussion Changeset discussion So, that has been done with good intentions, but not really in accordance with OSM rules and guidelines. Therefore, data quality (which is the top priority in OSM, not the amount of data) could easily be compromised.

Komentář od SomeoneElse z 18. 11. 2016 v 21:50

It’s also worth mentioning that I’m also seeing wikidata edits locally (to be clear, not from either of the users mentioned above) that seem to be linking “not quite the same thing” in OSM and wikidata, so care is still needed. As I said on the forum link posted above it’s “something that as a community we’d need to discuss”, and that doesn’t appear to be happenong, smiley face or no smiley face.

Komentář od BushmanK z 18. 11. 2016 v 22:14

I’d add that in Europe or another place with a high density of active mappers, a negative effect of similar behavior is usually reduced by a community due to constant checking and fixing. While in Africa, harm is way more significant, because it will way less unlikely fixed if needed. So, instead of praising this kind of activity, I’d say: “oh, well, now we have the whole bunch of potentially wrong data in Africa, where it will stay forever without being carefully checked”.

Přihlaste se k zanechání komentáře