On an average, there are atleast 40 data reverts per day. Most changesets comments are non descriptive like revert previous change
making it very hard for the community to track the action and any previous changeset or discussion.
It would be really useful if OSM implemented a changeset mention feature like GitHub, where if I fixed a changeset with a comment Remove duplicate features added in #47398827
, it would automatically add a comment to the original changeset and notify the original mapper and anyone in the community know what action was taken. This would greatly improve the social aspect of mapping and link discussions over multiple changesets.
Any other cases where this could be useful?
Фекер алышыу
imagicoтарафынан 3 April 2017 cәғәт 09:59көндө ҡаралған
Actually mapper mentions would be at least as useful but likely not really feasible due to the extreme abuse potential.
Note what you suggest, namely to automatically add a back-referencing changeset comment is much more obtrusive than the github feature which just silently adds a back-reference without a notification.
ff5722тарафынан 3 April 2017 cәғәт 10:41көндө ҡаралған
or you could just be considerate and comment on the changeset that was reverted.
PlaneMadтарафынан 3 April 2017 cәғәт 12:39көндө ҡаралған
Excellent, so lets have a back reference without a notification.
Its already being done. My suggestion is to use mentions to make it easier to navigate from one changeset thread to another.
TomHтарафынан 3 April 2017 cәғәт 16:41көндө ҡаралған
There have been many such proposals over the years - pretty sure there are tickets in github already.
Biggest problem is probably finding unambigous syntax for all the sorts of mentions (node/way/relation/changeset/user) that people want.
Well that and finding somebody that actually wants to implement it rather than just talk about how nice it would be of course ;-)
Stereoтарафынан 3 April 2017 cәғәт 16:57көндө ҡаралған
@imagico reddit limits abuse by only sending notifications if less than three users are mentioned.
tyr_asdтарафынан 4 April 2017 cәғәт 08:11көндө ҡаралған
What about just using URIs as identifiers? Github shortens typed URLs to other tickets:
http://github.com/project/issues/123
becomes#123
. That should work for us as well (e.g.http://www.openstreetmap.org/<type>/<id>
becomestype/id
or something similar). For user mentions the@username
pattern is already a well established.PlaneMadтарафынан 4 April 2017 cәғәт 10:40көндө ҡаралған
The OSM URIs are a great reference to start with. @ makes sense for usernames that can change and # for permanent ids. Also using the JOSM id shorthands for nodes, ways, relations can give a more crisp identifier:
#c47401880
or just#47401880
#n4774381279
#w484686953
#47401880/w484457693
@PlaneMad