OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

PlaneMad의 일기

Lets have changeset mentions

PlaneMad님이 English로 2017년 4월 3일에 게시함.

On an average, there are atleast 40 data reverts per day. Most changesets comments are non descriptive like revert previous change making it very hard for the community to track the action and any previous changeset or discussion.

It would be really useful if OSM implemented a changeset mention feature like GitHub, where if I fixed a changeset with a comment Remove duplicate features added in #47398827, it would automatically add a comment to the original changeset and notify the original mapper and anyone in the community know what action was taken. This would greatly improve the social aspect of mapping and link discussions over multiple changesets.

Any other cases where this could be useful?

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2017년 4월 3일 09:59에 imagico님의 의견

Actually mapper mentions would be at least as useful but likely not really feasible due to the extreme abuse potential.

Note what you suggest, namely to automatically add a back-referencing changeset comment is much more obtrusive than the github feature which just silently adds a back-reference without a notification.

2017년 4월 3일 10:41에 ff5722님의 의견

or you could just be considerate and comment on the changeset that was reverted.

2017년 4월 3일 12:39에 PlaneMad님의 의견

Note what you suggest, namely to automatically add a back-referencing changeset comment is much more obtrusive than the github feature which just silently adds a back-reference without a notification.

Excellent, so lets have a back reference without a notification.

or you could just be considerate and comment on the changeset that was reverted.

Its already being done. My suggestion is to use mentions to make it easier to navigate from one changeset thread to another.

2017년 4월 3일 16:41에 TomH님의 의견

There have been many such proposals over the years - pretty sure there are tickets in github already.

Biggest problem is probably finding unambigous syntax for all the sorts of mentions (node/way/relation/changeset/user) that people want.

Well that and finding somebody that actually wants to implement it rather than just talk about how nice it would be of course ;-)

2017년 4월 3일 16:57에 Stereo님의 의견

@imagico reddit limits abuse by only sending notifications if less than three users are mentioned.

2017년 4월 4일 08:11에 tyr_asd님의 의견

Biggest problem is probably finding unambigous syntax for all the sorts of mentions (node/way/relation/changeset/user) that people want.

What about just using URIs as identifiers? Github shortens typed URLs to other tickets: http://github.com/project/issues/123 becomes #123. That should work for us as well (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/<type>/<id> becomes type/id or something similar). For user mentions the @username pattern is already a well established.

2017년 4월 4일 10:40에 PlaneMad님의 의견

What about just using URIs as identifiers?

The OSM URIs are a great reference to start with. @ makes sense for usernames that can change and # for permanent ids. Also using the JOSM id shorthands for nodes, ways, relations can give a more crisp identifier:

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요