OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55603913 over 7 years ago

The landuse=forest seems to be removed in this changeset.

55331859 over 7 years ago

Are you able to verify if this fitness corner/park overlaps these buildings?

55342823 over 7 years ago

There is something wrong with this changeset. The park definitely does not cover the whole of a residential neighbourhood. Are you able to verify if this is correct?

54669294 over 7 years ago

Shouldn't these be marked as trunk_link instead?

53368671 over 7 years ago

Why was Dhoby Ghaut split into 2 different station nodes? Dhoby Ghaut is a 3 line interchange.

54154379 over 7 years ago

The Wiki is just additional information suggested for tagging presents, it does not strictly mean that it is the absolute or most correct way of tagging (especially when applied to local context). You may freely edit the Wiki to update or clarify the tag present.

In this case, these paths are definitely driveways and it is preferable to add the additional classification if its known. In particular, the full text suggests that the main service way should not be marked as driveway=parking_aisle as it is not a parking aisle but a driveway.
osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:service%3Ddriveway&diff=prev&oldid=1448780

54154379 over 7 years ago

Hi,
May I check why are the service=driveway type classification removed in the edit?

53726362 over 7 years ago

This changeset removed various 3D parts for Tanjong Pagar Centre. Are you able to add back the 3D parts?

Thanks.

52759754 almost 8 years ago

Hi,
I believe building=train_station should not be tagged as railway=station, but tagged as building=train_station with railway=subway_entrance. Your tagging will result in multiple railway station results which is not the case when a search is performed using nominatim.

46663245 about 8 years ago

Dear thenodifier,
I have reverted this changeset which incorrectly removed multiple building:part which is used for OSM 3D.

45796360 over 8 years ago

Hi,
Good to see your interest in OSM. It may be better to have the building tagged with amenity=parking, and leisure=park. Removing one or both features just to ensure it looks correct on the map is not really correct as people will not be able to find the car park if they are searching for that.

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

45796360 over 8 years ago

Hi,
I believe you are removing the car park in your change for the park. Are you able to clarify if the car park is there or is this change purely for Pokemon Go spawning purposes?

41665459 over 8 years ago

Hi,
The source for the buildings are tagged in the building's way.

28846000 almost 9 years ago

It is a real place.
https://www.pokemon.co.jp/gp/pokecen/english/megatokyo_access.html

37454231 over 9 years ago

Hi Olivier,
The building height for this building was already captured in a way with the tag building:part that lies within this building. It is incorrect to tag the outer building with levels as this will affect the 3D models rendered.

33204949 over 9 years ago

Amazing...

32886318 almost 10 years ago

Hi,

The Shonan-Shinjuku line relation is not a duplication and thus should not warrant deletion. On various parts of the line, the rail line is dual-tracked and this relation is part of two relations that tracks each direction, and linked via a route_master relation. The duplication on some parts of the line is because the physical railway track has not been updated to be dual-tracked, and to fully capture the route requires that the same piece of rail be included in relation in both directions.

See: osm.wiki/Relation:route_master

24794431 about 10 years ago

This changeset removes the subway line labels attached to the station name. While this is probably the "right" way to tag the stations, it is not consistent with how the other subway stations are tagged in NYC. Do you intend to change all stations or make the few station edits consistent with the other subway stations?

24758635 about 10 years ago

This changeset removes all the stations for the M Train. Is this intended to be the case?

29841200 over 10 years ago

Why was the Tanjung Puteri Golf Resort removed in this changeset? Was it incorrectly tagged and different from the satellite image?