@Woazboat
Your interpretation will likewise apply to service=driveway. That tag itself des not add much value in itself, so do you mean that all service=driveway tags should be removed?
How one determines additional value/information differs from another person. There is value that you do not see from such tagging.

The ways being tagged meets your definition.
1) Verifiable - paths tagged as such meets the Wiki definition.
2) Useful - what is useful to the mapper may not be useful to you, but in your view perhaps only your perception matters and not the mapper's.
3) Accepted by community - the tagging actually originated from avoiding the need to change the existing tag, as per the wishes of "the community". However, it does not preclude the mapper from tagging what he/she intends to map/tag. As stated previously, mappers are free to map what they want to map; this change is trying to subvert what the mapper intends to map.

If simply deleting off all custom tags across several changesets #125373826, #125428168, #125428245 in the middle of an active dispute does not consititute banning, without seeing logical rationale or procedures illustrates a experienced mapper, I am humbled by how such actions can be taken and further justified.

With your response, it will mean that the official policy should change to...
1) OSM has banned features.
2) Users can and should do automated edits to something that they have not mapped, even if it is different from the intent of the person mapping it.
3) Automated edits can be done without any manual review, "trust" is sufficient condition to trigger such edits.

Defines "driveway is a minor service road providing access from the highway to an offstreet area used for driving, servicing, parking, or otherwise accommodating motor vehicles", which can include minor roads linking to parking aisles, or minor roads linking to other minor roads. Your statement saying it is no meaning is false.

Trying to equate tag with meaning to h=oefotprkf is an instance of straw man argument. Please try something better.

Your stance and actions are unreasonable, and contradicts the infobox stating the following...
"The reason is documented in Deprecated features. You are still free to continue to use or interpret this tag as you see fit since OpenStreetMap does not have “banned features”.
Under no circumstances should you (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags to something else in the database on a large scale without conforming to the automated edits code of conduct. Any such change will be reverted."

Your actions, on contrast, is contradicting that.

"To define a service way in more detail, see service=*." You are missing the point stated above by saying it provides no specific meaning.

If we apply this logic to service=driveway, I can similar say that that particular tag also provides no specific meaning. Your logic is not valid.

As stated, there is no banned tags and what you or your community perceives as nonsense does not apply beyond your community. Further, you have no valid justification for any such change, and are in no position to dictate what mappers use.

Your change will be reverted as you are not able to provide any substantiation of your stand.

As a sidenote, this change also illustrates that whatever you have wrote as your values do not match the action seen here.

This changeset is an automated edit, solely based on your personal perception that this is nonsense.

The Wiki page itself is meant to document what is the tag meant to be. Woodpeck comment is regarding the removal of the Wiki page (which it is up to the discretion of the Wiki Administrators), but it should not stop mappers doing the actual mapping from mapping how they intend to (whether it is in the area of using a custom tag).

You are performing wilful data removal away by attempting to remove minor service road classification. The intention for the mapping here is to ensure all minor service roads are classified using service=* and have an approporiate minor service road type.

In any case, there is no banned features and this change should be reverted.

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/123855979

This change incorrect changes a building:part to become a building way, and duplicates the building. The previous tagging is correct.
osm.org/way/826116489

This change incorrectly removes the carpark building just for "fixing osmose" error.

This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Sega --> Lawson?

Hi,
OneMap is a valid source, but StreetDirectory is not a valid source due to license issues.

See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps