SHARCRASH's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
81355547 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for the effort! |
81355547 | over 5 years ago | OK good! Long steps! Is that entire way element made of steps or at least alternatively path and steps? |
81356304 | over 5 years ago | I know very well the way you changed here. It is not a grade2 in its entirety. The only hard details are few little stones and the big rock on the lower chicane which i represented as highway=steps. Again i should advise you to check on OSM's Wiki to see what a tag represents to avoid deceiving users. |
81355547 | over 5 years ago | Also using surface=earth with grade2 is contradictory. |
81355547 | over 5 years ago | Here the grade1 track goes actually until the road otherwise the routing is broken for 4wheeled vehicles. Also, in natural areas, favour path instead of footway, because a path is a more fundamental and neutral way than footway, which usually is rather a way structured specifically for pedestrians (foot + way). |
81355205 | over 5 years ago | Hello! Welcome to OSM! Please before applying any tag, check in OSM's wiki how to use it. Each tag can be applied only to certain elements (node, way, area and/or relation) and represents a certain feature or refines its description. The tag stairs=yes is very specific and applies only for "simple indoor tagging". See: osm.wiki/Key:stairs The tag highway=steps is the correct tag to use in this case in an independent way element. I guess that if there are stairs, and as the following way is a path, logically the track you changed has maybe been also mistagged by the previous contributor, but it was 10 years ago, such feature can change in time. |
81290220 | over 5 years ago | tag corrections* you silly iD :) |
81137801 | over 5 years ago | + tag corrections |
81129517 | over 5 years ago | +tag additions |
69637472 | over 5 years ago | So in my previous message...* |
69637472 | over 5 years ago | You had plotted a sinuous parallel trail to the main trail. The problem is that it you plotted it and created several crossways where there is none. I passed there last year in summer so i compared by memory, satellite photos and Heatmap GPS traces. All which did not correspond to what you edited 10 months ago. So in my previous emssage i told you that it would be great to respect what is on terrain, no just plot whatever way. :) |
69637472 | over 5 years ago | Hello! It would be great to respect what is on terrain so that you do not mislead people. This trail is used by sportive users for trail running, mountain biking... and is a dangerous area. Some people are cautious and will take their time whiel checking their gps but others might put their life in risk by paying more attention to their activity. Thanks for you consideration! |
80903851 | over 5 years ago | + new element |
63454208 | over 5 years ago | put it back as insect hotel only |
80652634 | over 5 years ago | sorry, deleted tags only, no element |
79009977 | over 5 years ago | Hello! Please, respect the tag's definition! See OSM's wiki for details. Examples:
Also if you add features which involve a side (kerbs, cliffs, retaining walls, embankments...) respect the direction of the way. Normally lowest side has extra drawing on one side of the line, not always rendered, so if you follow the direction of a way, right side is always lowest.
|
71205693 | over 5 years ago | Also, avoid to connect building to tags with the highway key. |
71205693 | over 5 years ago | |
71205693 | over 5 years ago | Hi! There is a specific scheme for educational features: building=school for the school's buildings and amenity=school for the school's grounds. What you tagged is the building. Please see OSM's Wiki for the right tag schemes adopted by the community. Gonna correct this. |
77088562 | over 5 years ago | J'ai corrigé. |