OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
117289384 over 3 years ago

+ fixme added

117058134 over 3 years ago

Salut! Les infrastructures liés à la relation de la Future PC8 osm.org/relation/13763857 existent déjà? Je ne pense pas vu que tu as écrit "future". Si c'est une question de max d'une semaine et poussières, c'est passable je dirai mais si ça risque de traîner je ne suis pas vraiment pour.

Dans OSM, on ne doit retranscrire que ce qu'on voit dans la réalité, c'est une règle fondamentale d'OSM, pour éviter d'induire en erreur les utilisateurs qui penseraient qu'elles sont déjà présentes.

Aussi la clé/key "state=*" je ne l'ai pas trouvé... Tu as une page d'OSM Wiki? Il y a des conflits entre utilisateurs pro et anti de la valeur "proposed". Juste pour te donner mon avis, je suis contre pour la raison que j'ai cité ici haut. En plus, parfois il y a eu des projets qui n'ont jamais abouti, donc pendant des années des données ont été enregistrées/utilisées pour rien, ont enduit en erreur, revérifications pour rien et au final qui nettoye... :)

101812541 over 3 years ago

I am cyclist too but there are other type of users that still must access those ways for different features: farmers, users from the tennis court, workers of the construction... I've corrected the end near the sports center. Is there any barrier here or is it just a board informing the closure and deviation: osm.org/node/8565584821 ?

101812541 over 3 years ago

Hi! Thanks for your contributions but I'd like you to realise that on certain changes you've been misleading people up to where they can access features like these examples i left in purpose to show you:
- this way is not entirely under construction osm.org/way/922704686 & this noexit is wrong osm.org/node/8565584822 Users can still go N up to near the end of the tennis courts.

- another noexit wrong osm.org/node/8565584821 whereas again users can actually go further to S up to here osm.org/node/7280496719

Also for FYI, the difference between note=... and description=... is that note is rather directed only to map contributors, whereas description is rather for all users, non mappers included (if the third part map renderer service shows such information). So it would have been better to add your message in description.

I'm wondering if there are other places where you've added such restrictions...

Can you please reply so that i know when you've seen my comment here and then i will correct. Thanks!

117160575 over 3 years ago

+ merged equal elements

117118025 over 3 years ago

+ intermittent added

117078907 over 3 years ago

Hi Gloda! You can also add a single building to gather all of them as "building=garages" to avoid heavy data for small devices. Please consider it.

117087971 over 3 years ago

+ tags corrected

117021827 over 3 years ago

Oh i realise now my error! I used bicycle=impassable instead of smoothness=impassable which is not "exotic" :) It is associated to more than 2 millions ways and fairly simple to implement to any routing service. Thanks for the hint! I will correct the tag and change yours to bicycle=dismount.

Yeah I've been on the terrain.

117058339 over 3 years ago

Finished! I've resolved the conflict i had to your version but you need to update all your data, just in case.

What i did is explained here osm.org/changeset/117058323 Normally i do favor tracks too if they are parallel to the road, but here even though you did a correct transposition, the final routing was not really the same because of what i explained.

117058339 over 3 years ago

We are working on the same features, this will creates conflicts if we both edit. I'm nearly fiinished

117058339 over 3 years ago

Hi! Please pause your edits for a moment because i've made a huge update on the tracks you had added in Esch-sur-Alzette.

117050561 over 3 years ago

cemetery Schifflange*

117050561 over 3 years ago

+fixme on service road to cemetery

117021827 over 3 years ago

Hi! Why would that path be forbidden to bicycles? There is no sign stating that, no regulation....

117001175 over 3 years ago

Great! Thanks!

117001175 over 3 years ago

Hi! Not sure what you did in this changeste, seems like you just reshaped the highways, but you disconnected a crossing in the process. osm.org/node/265344276

116837226 over 3 years ago

+ location for objects underwater

116833484 over 3 years ago

+ important to fixme: i don't see any lane for normal traffic allowed direction to N, ways concerned are:
osm.org/way/424736423
osm.org/way/856864164

101712886 over 3 years ago

Hi! Please, never ever do this again. It complicates the editing for everyone, creates errors of duplicated nodes, creates/renders extra useless data which needs to be processed. In extra you are using JOSM which allows fast and easy manipulation of all elements. If you need to unglue, you should glue them back. Thanks for your comprehension.