High Guido,

Dropped a note to the mapper of this few days ago, still does not render after your repairs. He did quite a bit of bad mapping so dropped him more comments, that stuff does render now including a vineyard that was actually a motocross pitch (must be looking at old imagery)

ciao

Hi,

I've corrected this vineyard relation and removed the orchard as member. Also a part of the orchard is a swimming pool with small building or roof. See the fixes in osm.org/changeset/140352630

ciao

Hi,

I've repaired this vineyard relation some members 3x part of the same one. 1 area looks in fact in ESRI like a motocross pitch and was made inner to the wrong vineyard osm.org/way/512794097
Now the area renders correctly, i.e. no large white space
osm.org/changeset/140352373

ciao

Hi,

This forest relation is pretty badly broken so it stopped rendering, multiple self intersections to be seen in OSM Inspector, indicatiing this happened some 9 days ago. Are you going to fix this or do we need to fly in Brigade Spéciale from abroad?

Let me know

ciao

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.29255&lat=43.99643&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,

This element
osm.org/way/1200757141
has to be removed from the meadow relation and deleted. The large meadow is now broken and does not render.

You have to repair it yourself as there are many more issues here to include meadow mapped in meadow with overlaps in to other areas.

ciao

NB The size of this CS Bound box is large due another new roundabout insert in the the SS81 and resorting of the constituent route relation members.

Hi

Deze wiki noemt geen afwijking mbt initialen in namen voor Nederland.

osm.wiki/Abbreviations

Er is ook geen link naar een Nederlandse vertaling die uitleg van de afwijking zou kunnen geven.

Waarom de voluit naam dan niet naar full_name verhuist kon worden is dan de andere vraag. Dan weten we waar die H.A. initialen voor staan, net als bij Drs F. het Ferry zou zijn.

ciao

Heel vreemd om Drs.F. Bijlweg op de adress nodes te zetten. Die sluiten nu niet meer aan met de naam op de straat zolas het boekje zegt het zou moeten zijn.

Tutti i problemi in colori restano

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=15&lat=42.35296&lon=14.40041&item=0000%2C0001%2C1010%2C1040%2C1050%2C1060%2C1070%2C1080%2C1100%2C1110%2C1140%2C1150%2C1160%2C1170%2C1180%2C1190%2C1200%2C1210%2C1220%2C1221%2C1230%2C1240%2C1250%2C1260%2C1270%2C1280%2C1290%2C1300%2C2010%2C2020%2C2030%2C2040%2C2060%2C2080%2C2090%2C2100%2C2110%2C2120%2C2140%2C2150%2C2160%2C3xxx%2C4010%2C4020%2C4030%2C4040%2C4070%2C4080%2C4090%2C4100%2C4110%2C5010%2C5020%2C5030%2C5050%2C5060%2C5070%2C5080%2C6010%2C6020%2C6060%2C7010%2C7011%2C7012%2C7020%2C7050%2C7051%2C7070%2C7080%2C7090%2C7110%2C7120%2C7130%2C7170%2C8010%2C8011%2C8012%2C8020%2C8021%2C8022%2C8025%2C8026%2C8030%2C8031%2C8032%2C8040%2C8042%2C8060%2C8070%2C8100%2C8101%2C8110%2C8120%2C8121%2C8122%2C8130%2C8131%2C8132%2C8140%2C8150%2C8160%2C8161%2C8162%2C8170%2C8180%2C8182%2C8190%2C8191%2C8192%2C8221%2C8230%2C8240%2C8250%2C8260%2C8310%2C8320%2C8330%2C8331%2C8340%2C8341%2C8350%2C8351%2C8360%2C8370%2C8380%2C8381%2C8382%2C8390%2C8391%2C8392%2C8400%2C8401%2C8410%2C8411%2C8412%2C8420%2C8430%2C8431%2C8450%2C8460%2C8470%2C8480%2C8490%2C8500%2C8510%2C8520%2C8530%2C9000%2C9004%2C9005%2C9006%2C9007%2C9009%2C9010%2C9011%2C9014%2C9015%2C9016%2C9017%2C9018%2C9019%2C9020&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=&username=&country=

Ciao e benvenuto su OSM,

Le tue modifiche all'area dello svincolo autostradale di Ortona hanno rotto un sacco di cose per includere i percorsi degli Flixbus. Ho riparato come meglio ho potuto. Tieni presente che ogni singolo pezzo di strada può avere relazioni di dipendenza, destinazioni, restrizioni e altro ancora, quindi la modifica deve essere fatta con la massima attenzione.

Buona mappatura.

routing incl pedone ;o)

Francamente, come questi dati siano finiti nell'OSM dal vivo è un enigma per me, ho già spostato e rimosso delle vere e proprie assurdità con strade che passano direttamente attraverso gli edifici. Non si dice chi sia la fonte dei dati e se questi siano autorizzati a essere importati in OSM.

Salute

errata, i signali

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1070&zoom=17&lat=41.836436&lon=14.600272&level=2&tags=&fixable=

Ciao

"dati verificati su fonti open". Non credo che sia così, perché molti edifici si trovano sopra le vie mappate in passato. Si prega di correggere.

Grazie

Hi,

I nomi dei serbatoi di emergenza sono "generici" e quindi non devono essere inseriti come nomi. L'ho notato solo perché sembra che tu stia copiando da qualche altra parte con l'aggiunta di uno spazio suffisso, come ha fatto un altro mappatore nella zona.

ciao

Hi,

Per your CS alert "warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part "could you please finish mapping the forest outline as right now it's broken and no longer rendering

thanks

PS

Level 1-2-3 is actually an Osmose flag, yup,

You can hit ignore on the pins. It's true, have a turning circle which one would expect for that to be the end of the way near an another way and that warning pops up. Most of the times there's actually a footway of some kind to continue but if the top (say northbound) of the turning circle e.g. has a guard_rail east west and then a road east west, and that's within 15 meters, the analysers want the assertion that it truly is the end, no foot or other connection that could be used to continue. I look for any path and else put the noexit=yes just on the turning_circle in that case, nothing nefarious as intentionally hiding.

Hallo

heb per ongeluk gekeken en de vraag rees hoe use_path te rijmen is met de absentie van een gemapt fietspad?
Vroeg me ook af qua routing hoe men van het 1 way tussenstuk op fiets naar de parallelle fietspad komt. Tegen het verkeer in? Als er een weg is dan misschien informeel mappen met highway=cycleway+cycleway=link. Nu moet je op de hoofdweg fietsen tot de Bella Vista voordat je over kunt switchen.

Hi

I think that was the legacy code used at the time no ptv tag was present when i was closing endless gaps in routes and i think Osmose was prompting. Now adays it would be 1 or 2 depending on if a routemaster is linked or not, so JOSM would be flagging while fixing routes.
Correcting? Just because platform was deprecated does not make it wrong. Platform in the human readable equivalent of 1, but I'll have a look at this one and surely when updating the whole thing starts snowballing again as it always does when touching a Rome street that has a PT route association and sure enough testing a few whether 1 or 2 the validation errors flagged for all touched by the 981 e.g., something ID hardly does, IS beyond believe to include newly added route gaps. 981 went from v69 i last touched is to v76. Would need some serious dedicated time to sort all this mess out. Sigh.

Cheers

Hi,

Fixed some routing issues on your Arielli-Petriccio of type "Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle". Tested the GraphHopper/Valhalla bicycle route from P to A and A to P.

osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.36272%2C14.39968%3B42.38586%2C14.35689
osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.3859%2C14.3569%3B42.3627%2C14.3997#map=15/42.3738/14.3783

The OSRM bicycle route does a big detour but since I know Komoot & Bosch Connect do the route correctly along the Petriccio, think it's a OSRM specific problem.

ciao