Hi

Since you are the author of the Latest 'new' key report, would there be the possibility to run such a report at a user level i.e. pour moi? I'd be eradicating my own typos and strays without delay (fixing my caused troubles I do as a daily chore as reported by Osmose and Neis, can't stand them lingering).

cheers

Except for the 2 polar zones you did not miss to get a single spot included in your change set boundary box and all with just 7 nodes. It's new record in drawing attention.
Thank you for contributing but please, next time save those changes 1 by 1 and only the very local fellow mapper will see them flashing by.

Greetings from italy, somewhere between detention river and the dinsmore colony.

OK Went ahead and replaced tags for motorhome and caravan and added total capacity tag... 1, not much room for both at the same time. On reflection, think to remember the others just had a sanitary dump point but no special parking.

cheers

PS The aerials as offered by OSM are severely outdated where ESRI world imagery Clarity Beta is again ages behind ESRI world clarity (the one without enhancements). It's easy to not see buildings, when they're new and v.v. see buildings when they've long been demolished. Case in point Streetview imagery in my region can vary from nov 2009, much from 2011 and some 2009 and a lot from nov-2020 to feb 2021 (latter I'd trust). No reliance but on site surveying.

Just so everyone is aware, level0 editor - does not close - the CS even if you save the edit building by building. Absolutely NOT recommended to use when consecutive edits touch on a wide geographical area. The same goes for StreetComplete. This one is maybe related to the OSM Latest keys list which captures all these key typos daily, one of the links for each entry goes to the level0 editor.

The painted word is Camper, so guess motorhomes and caravans. I've mapped more or
less half a dozen of these in the region think all along the autostrade fuel stations. It's a popular tag per taginfo, capacity:motorhome, 34, caravan, 270, caravans, 100, so guess those are the canonical, the singular that is.

ciao

PS feel free to make the amendment.

Moved city_limit node off-road to side, added 'end' tag and added second sign opposite for 'begin' of Roccamontepiano.

It's the holiday season... gone 'home' and then do edits at the same time where they live, or the other way arounds. Seen half a dozen of these in the last week. It's a systemic problem. AND StreetComplete. It clearly says you should edit only in the spot you are... while surveying. At the same time, though edits are transmitted the OSM system keeps the save set open and just concatenates any additional of the same type. At times when looking at a large area edit set it says that you cant' comment because the edit has not closed. It can take several hours before closing.

NB iD Editor 2.20.0 often does not warn on save, which was never the problem in 2.19.6. Worse, you tag inner or outer, get a warning on save, go back and see the tag took hold, yet the yellow blob comes up that the outer/inner tag was not applied. Really slows editing down these false positives. At times it takes even 5-10 seconds or never for any alert to show. Edit in fully updated Vivaldi on Chrome engine, all permissions granted.

PS tweak road position and add farm track.

It's funny how when the last editor was yourself it's 'improvement' but if you were not it's a fix... goodies, for you adding the operator and vat ref to McD

Just looked at your stats and your errors and warnings tally is skyrocketing, 1800 total now, as are your 'ignored' warning, way past 300. Just why you have 822 reversals to your name should have one wondering what's on with your contributions.

Have a good mapping day. ;o)

hi there,

I'm still here, waiting on my Covid shot, domani. It's funny to see bus stops on the south side of Vespucci when it's 1 way east to west there. I've noticed in one alert if a bus stop if tagged to a route and it's on the other side of a road it's flagged as being on the wrong side, but these are not linked. These particularly I took a picture of, at least 2 are of the 19th century model, probably from way before Vespucci for the majority part became 1-way. Historic relics.

ciao

... again

Sorry, no idea why I landed here but when I'm in Italy and edit sets appear in my local change set history I look why someone creates half Europe noticing edits with maproulette, I look.

PS The cliff side points to the left, the little triangles have to point to the lower side i.e. the river I think. Just right click on line and hit the << symbol to reverse the cliff direction.

This is really very very strange. There was a frana mapped, 6-8 months ago, by you I think to remember. I cycled the path and found the same approaching from the bridge. Then another mapper n34s changed it as okay again. I tried the path again and found the repair near invisible, solid 4 wheel track, cycled from the bridge all the way to the A14 underpass. Now you are reporting the path has collapsed again. Is this a different location?

Don't have the GPS trace anymore to see where it was I turned around on the vary narrow path before ending in the river, which is why I'm asking.

cheers

Question is, why did you edit 2 relations in what looks like Siberia and then 2 ways on the US west coast. Each should have been done and saved separately. With JOSM I'm told it's rather easy to split the save creating very small bound boxes.

Note the help names of the scrub types will be removed when mapping has finished. Unfortunately there's no visual feedback of the density tag selected, all renders identical.

Hi,

I've inspected the whole stretch and added the traffic signs to the side of the road of Lungofino. Basically, some is 70, a lot is 50, and most all is no overtaking. While there, adjusted/added some road names per corner signs, added lanes/paving type. Where Lungofino starts is unclear. The first sign is where the 2nd sign at the corner says Via Imperato (name added to road).

If you see something wrong or have addition information let me know and we can discuss.

ciao

Global janitorial should be used judiciously. I bet data consumers know rather well about standard deviations in tagging so whether debit_card or debit_cards, credit_card or credit_cards or creditcards, they'll be captured properly in the correct slot, tomorrow there will be a debit_card again. Case in point, I looked at a drop down list for a certainly available value and there were 3 variations, still with iD Editor's 2.20.0 NSI's fed drop down lists, a ladi-dah, a ladi_dah and a ladidah, only to learn from taginfo which is the commonly used.
Blame?.. my double ristretto has not kicked in yet, global mappers are aware, the opening salvo comment with each in the series shows awareness it reaches into most every mappers history view and as said, data consumers, who's maps is what the end user looks at, know too about the value variations.

Just a consideration when going global 'error' netting.