PS I've deleted your road duplications.

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 20 warnings with this edit. If a road has a name or a section and you have a source:name reference than add the name to the existing road to the section that carries that name.

ciao

Hello

Please DONT map roads on top of already existing roads. If you did not notice you had 10 warnings with this edit.

ciao

Maybe you should have waited on a response on your first global edit to include that one was replacing 1 invalid/imprecise tag with another. Neither payment:debit_cards or credit_cards is proper.

Actually payment:debit_cards is as invalid / imprecise a payment method tag as payment:debit_cards. Should not be used at all. payment:maestro would be a valid one, but globally it varies by country like here payment:bancomat=yes would be a correct debit card key. Same goes for payment:credit_cards, imprecise and flagged.

But anyway, thanks for yet 3 or more global edit I had no desire at all to see in my local edit history list.

Hi,

Whilst you have resolved dozens of issues, it may be a good idea to review what you mapped as when you saved it with iD Editor there were 30+ warnings

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 26
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway 3
warnings:mismatched_geometry:vertex_as_point 1
warnings:missing_tag:descriptive 3

highway-highway should be easy, roads crossing and no connecting node, impossible, a oneway the wrong e.g..

From little Italy.

Hi,

Coincidental passer by... Just noticed the forest areas mid river were invisible in the map rendering, which is why. They seem to be permanently above water so tagged them to be that.

PS added a small building near the end of the added path, possibly a refugio.

Thanks for contributing to OSDM. Just why the Korea peninsula and US east coat in one edit set. Few will comprehend but you should know every mapper in-between is forced to see this in their local change set history list. Did you want that to happen? Please split your edits per country and save them separately.

Many thanks in advance.

PS 'MO' is not a proper change set comment description. Write in word what you did. There's a wiki discussing the good bad and ugly.

Your changeset of yesterday has so far necessitated me to restore and repair 21 broken highway continuity issues flagged in Osmose. PLZ STOP. You evidently do not to understand the inter-relation of various streets and road ratings and why they are what they are.

Fix includes resolving flag "Wrong highway on roundabout"

What's bad is that ALL CS's by wheelmap uses the default "Modified via wheelmap.org". Can't possibly believe they cannot put proper descriptive comments in, even the level 0 bare bones editor allows to overwrite the generic comment text. Something for the chiefs to address with she/him/them. Popular last few days... somewhere up north and then as cherry a node in the ME or Far East.

It IS a deal when confronted with these a dozen times a day, and 90% always seem to come from the same corner on this planet. Maybe this could be made a talking point at the local chapters of OSM contributors. A permanent footnote on every wiki page. "Map Local in a session, map within your borders. U Too!"

Thanks for the assist on this goal. route SP58 is done.

The SP58 sign is on the wrong side of the rotonda. I'll amend, triple ref :O)))

ON majella, more and more signs get replaced. My source is a visit to the buro of tourism in Pretoro. All their material is j, as it was last year in Sant'Eufemia. She said it's has some international reasoning behind it... a foreigner phonetically hears a j and will search with that spelling. It's wurst to me long as it's consistent.

Corner of the Lettomanoppello rotonda in my 2020 personal imagery and that of recent streetview shows SP58-0 direction upper LM at left. That's another one to dig out, but of lesser routing significance. Few days ago charted the SP59 and SP59b which is Turrivilignano direction than down again to Villa Breda. SP58 did not seem farfetched, but as said, it's something for the reverse polish task stack.

I go by the km road signs and spot checked from the beginning and end and all are SS614 as described in my previous comment, so I'll proceed with the route taking your ANAS link as canonical, virtually 27km, albeit their map on their page actually shows the old SP65 tag from Scafa to Lettomanoppelo (OFL). La Majelletta (new spelling), is just a sub set of the route, the whole simply Strada Statale 614, and yes, there's been those hand overs.

BTW, I cycled from Sulmona to Pescara along the Tiburtina end of June, actually just east at Pratola Peligna came on, not a single sign SR5, all SS5, direction signs as well. It's the chaos by design I suppose :O)))

OK, so found km signs 26-0, I, II, III and those indicate it's SS614. There must be some other document but the search engine eludes me. Maybe it's a descend from Passo Lanciano to the wolf junction, i.e. Scafa, Lettomanoppello, PL, wolf rotonda. 26km and a bit would approximate the distance to those 2 points.

TTYL.

Ah yes, the wiki https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strada_statale_614_della_Maielletta