Jan 16 - Jan 24 is certainly an unnecessary repetition same as it would be with e.g. Su 13:00 - Su 23:00, Anyway, thought I'd mention the allnighters for the icecream shop.

Thanks for the link BTW, a handy in-browser check when baffled by an error flag.

ciao

Hi,

Ma.Sa opening hours flagged in QA, from 21:30 to 13:00 next day does not seem right too, maybe the other way. Anyway, this is the suggested format without correction of the seeming inversion
We 06:00-13:00,21:30-13:00; Th-Su 21:30-13:00; Jan 16-24 off

ciao

Hi,

I've made a bunch of inner/outer role and multipolygon outline corrections in the region in the last few days with you listed as the last editor, this morning another 3 MP areas. Please study for your future endeavours allowing prevention prior to these being flagged on OSM Inspector

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.81492&lat=44.59267&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

happy mapping.

OK render is restored

Actually, you removed tourism=hotel at the same time which is a tag that makes the name render in Carto Standard (but not the area so you get lots of white space on large event areas.)
It's BTW a choice whether retail (restaurant) or hotel (commercial services). so I went for the 1st, coins have just 2 sides ;p).

ciao again

Hi,

Slip off the typeboard, changed your building=yes for the hotel area to landuse=retail which facilitates rendering as well. (So happens had to research this for one I've passed many times near Collecorvino and finally mapped ;o).

ciao

Also removed non-power mast node from long powerline making bound box big, sorry.

Hi,

I looked at just 1 of 168 nodes: osm.org/node/4591029145/history

Really makes sense, not, twice a value of foundry on the same object, but maybe you can wise me up and assure me that all is fine with this one and the other 167.

ciao

Corr. link percorso osm.org/relation/15429041

Benvenuti in OSM.

Dopo aver esaminato il tuo primo contributo, ho creato un percorso a piedi su percorsi esistenti e ho rimosso il tuo percorso mappato sopra questi percorsi già esistenti. Vedi questa relazione del percorso osm.org/relation/1542904

Usalo come riferimento quando pianifichi di creare altre percorsi pedonali locali.

Buona mappatura

This CS also addresses the forest relation over lapping, thus rendering over the grassland strip

Hi,

Sorry about the "incorrect" name change of operator. It's in fact the ID editor tag upgrade wizard that filled this in changing Transdev Valence Mobilité to Transdev Valence resulting in a mismatch of operator name between the route and the route master which then is flagged in Osmose the next day. ID simply asks "upgrade the tags".
The person I communicated w/ in past was bhouse (Github name suggestion index (NSI)), about 1-1.5 years ago, on another preset-wizard mistake.

ciao

Hi,

OSM Inspector flagged multiple relation issues on this forest with farmland pockets, so I overhauled and simplified down from 13 to 6 members, then added few more. No need to map duplicate inner outlines, simply select the forest outline and the inside farmland, then hit the + sign in the pop up menu and correct roles are assigned automatically in ID editor.

See osm.org/changeset/132003667

ciao

OK, render has been successfully restored till next time a mapper does not verify that members of the same multipolygon relation can not overlap each other's areas.

Hi

Note that the tag of virtual=yea is "supplemental" to the key of highway=footway to indicate it's for routing purposes only. A way with just this virtual=yes does not tell what the reason of existance is.

Ciao

Hello Antonio2162

Si prega di consultare osm.org/changeset/131971748#map=18/41.43664/15.56372

Dovresti correggere le strade esistenti, non mapparne di nuove sopra di esse.

Ciao

Hi

Think you addr-essed this to the wrong person, I merely corrected the adrr key as flagged by New Keys QA and yes noticed the city was missing. The person to give your list to is over at osm.org/changeset/131850052 but see another mapper already gave that one a longer reply.

ciao

Hi,

Hai mappato una via che in precedenza era già mappata e trasferita alle vie esistenti come percorso.

osm.org/edit?way=1021998632#map=17/41.34307/13.87280

Lo stesso è stato fatto con tutte le 7 tappe di Filippo.

ciao

Yup, the initial parking:side= is for where, what, the position section of the wiki and XD it is as Osmose still does not understand both nor does it when the orientation changes indicated by the changing 'marking' and I'm certainly not going to cut up a street because part is diagonal, parallel, perpendicular.

TGIF

Well aware of the poor responsiveness of the 1 CS mapper entries, but there's always hoping.